Showing posts with label Kirsten Dunst. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kirsten Dunst. Show all posts

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Throwback Thursday Review: 'Jumanji' (1995)

Welcome to my last scheduled Throwback Thursday Review of 2017! This may or may not be the final Throwback Thursday posted before January 31st, because I have eight other Throwback Thursday Reviews I simply didn't get around to writing for various reasons, but it depends on how I choose to proceed. As some of you may have noticed, my internship is over and I've been publishing reviews like crazy! This encompasses the following films so far: Star Wars: The Last JediCocoMurder on the Orient Express (2017)American MadeIt (2017), and Lady Bird.

Reviews you should certainly expect to see published by the year's end include The PostJustice LeagueThor: RagnarokThe ForeignerBlade Runner 2049The Killing of a Sacred DeerProfessor Marston and the Wonder WomenThree Billboards Outside Ebbing, MissouriDarkest HourThe Disaster ArtistThe Shape of WaterFerdinandMolly's Game, and Call Me By Your Name... What a mouthful! These are all in some stage of my review process ranging from "I've seen it, but have yet to write anything down about it" all the way to completed.

Anyways, this week I'm reviewing the original 1995 version of Jumanji to commemorate the release of the 2017 sequel/reboot that hit theaters yesterday, Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle. I did get a chance to see the film yesterday because the company I was interning for treated the interns to an outing to see the film, and it was the one overwhelmingly chosen by just about everyone but myself for whatever reason. So there may or may not be a review already uploaded by the time you're reading this, but you can access it by clicking the blue hyperlink with the film's title if there is. (Fun Fact: This is the case anytime I mention a film title that I've reviewed).

'Jumanji' (1995) Review


Jumanji rolls its dice and first lands audiences in 1869 Brantford, New Hampshire, where two brothers desperately bury a chest in hopes it will never be found. One hundred years later, a young bullied boy named Alan Parrish finds the chest inside a construction site upon hearing the beats of African drums. Parrish brings the chest home and opens it to discover only a board game inside. When his friend Sarah Whittle comes by the house, the two start a game of Jumanji and learn that the pieces move by themselves and mysterious messages appear in the game's center whenever a player rolls the dice. Soon a colony of African bats appear out of nowhere and Alan is sucked into the game. Sarah runs away in fear of the bats, and the game is forgotten. 
That is, until a pair of siblings move in the Parrish house with their aunt upon losing their parents in a skiing accident. Peter and Judy Shepherd hear the drums and soon discover the game for themselves. After a few turns accidentally unleashing hosts of wild creatures, a strange man emerges from the game, who the children soon learn to be a thirty-eight year old Alan Parrish. They then must work together to finish the game to undo everything and restore order. 

Jumanji was directed by Joe Johnston with a screenplay adapting Chris Van Allsburg's classic children's fantasy book, also called Jumanji, penned by Jonathan Hensleigh, Greg Taylor, and Jim Strain. Since its 1995 release, Jumanji has become known as one of those classic family-friendly films. However, upon rewatch (I hadn't seen it for many years), I believe the film's fondly remembered primarily because of Robin Williams. This isn't to say Jumanji is bad, but it the film is admittedly dated. It's clear to me why someone pitched a sequel/reboot to Sony. It's a marketable property that can be brought back using an angle of nostalgia to reel audiences into the theater.
With that being said, the early CGI is TERRIBLE. It's no wonder people were so distrusting of the technology when it was first introduced, because none of it looked believable. Instead the monkeys look like terrible video game avatars.
The practical effects, on the other hand, held up much better to the scrutiny of today's standards. Sure, they're obviously fake-looking as well, but the practical creatures and plants seem far more tangible than the digital effects. 
I was slightly surprised to take notice of some seriously dark undertones in Jumanji that I probably never gave a second thought as a kid. A boy misses out on twenty six years of his life, never learning the things most people would in late childhood and early adulthood. He regrets having ever opened the game. He regrets telling his father he'd never speak to him again, because he truly never can now that he's returned and his parents are already deceased. On top of that, the two siblings Peter and Judy are recently orphaned. Like I said, some dark stuff... 
That's not even to mention how terrifying all the situations of the game must be to a young child. I can't imagine feeling inclined to show a child Jumanji till they're at least ten. Although the dated effects may not be as frightening to a kid now because they're used to higher quality effects, I'd imagine the idea behind Jumanji might scare them all the same.
However, the puzzling premise and captivating cast on display guarantee Jumanji is a fun, adventurous ride. The dialogue can be cheesy and the situations can feel contrived at times, but the two aforementioned elements outshine the worst of it. It's a story where the antagonist is a board game, which manages to manifest itself so that the player must confront their deepest fears and insecurities to emerge victorious. How fascinating is that?
Robin Williams is the one who holds it all together of course. Williams is simply one of those actors whose endless charm never gets old, and it's amazing how he still manages to make us smile post-mortem. Here though, Williams doesn't just win us over with that sparkle in his eye. He remains balanced between his light-hearted adventurous spirit and a down-to-earth humanity, so it's truly no wonder that audiences remember his performance to this day.
 
Elsewhere, Kirsten Dunst and Bradley Pierce are a step above the average child actors and Bonnie Hunt's Sarah Whittle goes from frantic and frizzled to confident and assured. Johnathan Hyde, Bebe Neuwirth, and David Alan Grier can also be found among the ensemble as various stock characters, but they play their parts well. 
In all honesty, Jumanji isn't the masterfully-made movie you remember it to be, but Jumanji's themes hold just as much weight as they did twenty-two years ago... And for that reason, I can say its status as a classic is well-earned. 

Film Assessment: B

Monday, May 8, 2017

Throwback Thursday Review: 'Spider-Man 3'

This review's a few days late because I wanted to be sure I got my Triple-R over Guardians of the Galaxy and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 review uploaded and I had other prior conflicting commitments. To make up for the delayed review I'm going to be reviewing the entire Alien Anthology prior to Alien: Covenant's release next week. Anyways, this week I'm reviewing Spider-Man 3 to tie into Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 as a Marvel release this past weekend and simultaneously advance my series of Spider-Man reviews swinging into July's Spider-Man: Homecoming. I'll go ahead and give you a head's up that this review will include spoilers but the film is ten years old at this point so if you haven't seen it yet then it's not really a big deal. For the remainder of May I'll be publishing Throwback Thursday Reviews over Despicable Me, Prometheus, and Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides, Retrospective Reviews for the Alien Anthology, and new reviews including King Arthur: Legend of the SwordAlien: CovenantBaywatch, and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales.

'Spider-Man 3' Review


Spider-Man 3 serves as the concluding chapter for this iteration of the web-head. Resuming immediately after the events of Spider-Man 2, Peter Parker is just getting into the swing of balancing his dual identities only to have danger looming overhead once more. Spider-Man 3 is a widely maligned feature, failing to materialize into a thrilling threequel and cap off an incredible superhero trilogy. Sam Raimi returned to direct and lent his hand to penning Spidey's third screenplay. Raimi's creative lens helps to steer Spider-Man 3 away from being a total disaster but his touch wasn't enough to completely save the venture.  
Raimi and cinematographer Bill Pope were able to construct at least one great scene to juxtapose nearly every atrocity captured but none of it really makes up for the fact that Spider-Man 3 shouldn't have turned out this badly. Spider-Man 3's main issue is its insistence on being three different films featuring three (a case could be made for four) different antagonists that were forcibly interwoven into one overcooked mess. The script comes from the brain trust of previous script spinner Alvin Sargent, Sam and Ivan Raimi. 
There are plenty of story components to pick apart but I'd say the most pressing problem was an overcrowded story that didn't particularly service any of the characters. For starters, Peter's facing at least three sources of conflict and that's an overwhelming amount to resolve in two and a half hours, give or take. There's the pre-established quarrel between Peter and Harry and the introduction of Sandman and Venom, the latter of which never quite jive into Spider-Man 3's natural narrative. You'd think that the sensible direction to follow would be for Harry to take the mantle of being Spidey's big baddie considering the groundwork has been lain in two prior franchise entries. 
However, Sony seemed to really want to force Venom into it (this is still evident today with plans to release a standalone Venom movie next year) and Raimi must have been dying to play around with Sandman. It's not that these villains are all terrible, rather the fact that they weren't all pertinent to the story at hand and don't fit well together. 
This is especially evident in the design and layout of the film. First, Harry's the threat until he suddenly gets amnesia. Then Sandman comes out of nowhere to bring everything full circle regarding the death of Uncle Ben till he's temporarily disposed. Eddie Brock fills the void of Peter's workplace rival at the Daily Bugle and the symbiote arises as a symbol of Peter's inner conflict. Eventually the two join forces to become Venom but till that point remain separate sources of conflict. 
One common thing you'll notice is that no more than three of these antagonists are adversarial towards Peter at once. The threats work but only two or three at a time due to the constraints of the narrative, almost like a game of Whack-A-Mole. Fifteen minutes into the film Harry gets amnesia so he's friendly till he regains his memories. During that time Sandman resurges, Eddie Brock threatens his livelihood, and the symbiote latches onto Peter in his most troubling time. Sandman is almost immediately disposed of (for the time being) and the symbiote gets put away for a bit. Harry regains his memories and Brock continues to be a jerk at work. Peter pulls out the symbiote again and fights Harry once he realizes his memories have resurfaced. When Harry's defeated, he remains on the sidelines. Sandman re-emerges and Brock and the symbiote coalesce into Venom. 
That's not even mentioning the string of plot-holes in between or the cringeworthy mess that is emo Peter Parker dancing at a jazz club... 
Believe it or not though, there are actually redeeming aspects to Spider-Man 3 if you know where to look such as the fights between Sandman and Peter, Peter's second confrontation with Harry, Harry's sacrifice, J. Jonah Jameson, or simply the fact that the black symbiote suit looks wickedly awesome. However, all these stand-out sequences or memorable moments are paired with an equally atrocious scene so it all kinda evens out when it's all said and done. The visual effects are inconsistent to say the least with gorgeous renderings opposed to disgusting digitized avatars and inadequate green screen work. It almost makes you wish they had gone the Spider-Man route, utilizing more practical effects or at least cut out a few baddies to conserve the budget. Elsewhere, Christopher Young stepped up to the plate after Danny Elfman bolted and I've gotta say he did a commendable job at composing some beautiful pieces to coincide with Elfman's pre-existing heroic anthems. 
For anyone that's followed my reviews of the two predecessors, you should be well aware I'm not a fan of Tobey Maguire in the role of Spider-Man. Maguire purely lacks charisma when he puts on the suit so I never buy the dual identity dynamic of Peter Parker/Spider-Man and his stint with the symbiote this time around is painful to watch. I'll admit he's got the awkwardness of Parker down to a tee, just no other aspect of his personality. 
Kirsten Dunst's Mary Jane is once again relegated to her familiar damsel duties and she's fine at that I guess. However, I personally would have rather seen Mary Jane do anything else than be exploited by the villain for a nefarious scheme to ensnare Spider-Man for the third consecutive time. 
James Franco is probably the only returning cast member who I feel truly grew as an actor over the course of making these movies. Franco provides one of the better performances in the crowded ensemble, finally letting Harry's malevolent side loose, and Franco found a nice balance between being friend and fiend. Other retuning mainstays include J.K. Simmons and Rosemary Harris as Daily Bugle's irksome editor and the tender, supportive aunt. Newcomers include Thomas Hayden Church, Bryce Dallas Howard, and Topher Grace. Church brings terrific concealed tragedy to Flint Marko, making Sandman stand out as one of the more compelling characters among the group. Howard offers a fine portrayal of Gwen Stacy but has little more to do than serve as a love triangle/relationship drama plot device. 
Lastly, Topher Grace feels the most out of place among the ensemble as both Eddie Brock and Venom. Grace is suffficient in bringing a displeasing demeanor to Brock but Grace's portrayal of Venom verges on being featured in a scary Saturday morning cartoon. Raimi does his best to make Grace's over-the-top performance menacing, but it flounders with mixed results. 
I could go on and on about how flawed Spider-Man 3 is but I'm pretty sure you either already know from personal experience or get the gist from my extrapolation and analysis. When it comes down to it, Spider-Man 3's placement in the Raimi Spider-Man trilogy is equivalent to Spider-Man scaling the Empire State Building only to dive off the with no web fluid, no parachute, and only a rusty trampoline underneath to break his fall. 

Film Assessment: D+

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Throwback Thursday Review: 'Spider-Man 2'

Sorry this was published a little late due to my trip to Orlando for Star Wars Celebration this past weekend. Anyways, I'm continuing my series of Spider-Man reviews leading up to Spider-Man: Homecoming with my review of Spider-Man 2. Tomorrow I'll review Transformers: Dark of the Moon and next week will be a Throwback Thursday Review over Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End before I continue this series with my thoughts on Spider-Man 3. Other reviews you may see throughout April include The Boss BabyThe Zookeeper's WifeGoing in StyleFree Fire, and The Circle but don't be too surprised if reviews over The Boss BabyThe Zookeeper's Wife, and Going in Style don't end up happening. 

'Spider-Man 2' Review


Nominated for: Best Visual Effects, Best Sound Editing, and Best Sound Mixing.
Won: Best Visual Effects.

In Spider-Man 2, Peter Parker finds it difficult to balance everyday life with his web-slinging antics. The opening thirty minutes show Parker being fired from his part-time job as a pizza delivery guy, consistently missing class, failing to attend a single performance of Mary Jane's play The Importance of Being Earnest, and on-top that forgetting his own birthday. Struggling to find his place in the world, Parker's abilities begin to wither out and he questions whether he should continue being Spider-Man.
Returning director Sam Raimi guided the friendly, neighborhood web-head to new heights for his second go around. One fascinating aspect of Spider-Man 2 is that it's a multi-faceted feature with broad appeal to children and adults. Growing up, I absolutely loved Spider-Man 2 for it's colorful, campy nature and the exhilarating action but I never realized how complex the underlying narrative was till more recent revisits. Everyone can relate to juggling the hectic schedule accompanying their everyday lives and Raimi expertly channeled the frantic nature of a busy agenda. Raimi maintained the exhilarating energy he brought to the action in Spider-Man, even pushing the envelope further in some instances (ie. the train sequence) and really fleshing out the characters to ground the outlandish world around them thanks to his team of screenwriters.
Alfred Gough, Miles Millar, and Michael Chabon lent their expertise to develop the screen story whilst Alvin Sargent penned the screenplay and the end result is an incredibly relatable superhero movie. The story never feels compromised for the sake of spectacle and vice versa, the action's never shortchanged to enhance the drama. Even though Spider-Man 2 is thirteen years old, the visual effects hold up remarkably well and certainly stood the test of time as Spider-Man's heroics seemed not only plausible but it was convincing thanks to the excellent technical execution of both practical effects and CGI. On top of all that, the costumes are amazing and Danny Elfman unsurprisingly composed another marvelous score that's got the grandeur one would expect to accompany the quintessential hero, the sprawling epic nature of an adventurous blockbuster, and the more compassionate character arrangements. I have a few nitpicks here and there such as the writing for Mary Jane, positioning her as the typical damsel-in-distress and her overall cliché characterization, but for the most part there's little to detract from Spider-Man 2.
Tobey Maguire's performance is an improvement over his first incarnation but once again he really fails to apprehend the duality required by the role. Maguire absolutely encapsulated the awkward geekiness of Peter Parker but was still lacking the cool, collected quippy demeanor of Spider-Man. He throws out one-liners but his inflection just doesn't allow them to come across to be as energetic as they are intended to be.
Kirsten Dunst is once again trapped in the stereotypical role of the female love interest, doomed to persistently be Spidey's damsel, while James Franco gets to sink his teeth into a meatier character arc as Harry Osborn transitions into adulthood. Rosemary Harris and J.K. Simmons each return as Aunt May and J. Jonah Jameson to respectively act as Peter's moral compass and bark orders like nobody's business.
Meanwhile, Alfred Molina stepped into the shoes of Williem Dafoe to act as the new big bad, bolstering the antagonistic presence of Dr. Otto Octavius. Molina's Doc Ock is a layered villain whose course of action can be grasped, he gets to toy with all the fun of being the mad scientist and simultaneously handle the physical aspect of the conflict thanks to Doc Ock's robotic tendrils making him a versatile threat. It's that balance of knowledge and power that allows to Doc Ock to demand attention and march about with serious gravitas.
I'll go ahead and now reveal that Spider-Man 2 is currently my favorite Spider-Man film. This is in large part to how rich and complex the character and storytelling lain out prove to be under the guise of a fun comic book movie. Spider-Man 2 has just about everything a great Spider-Man flick needs; an engaging narrative fueled by captivating character arcs, astonishing action, and ideal execution. Spider-Man 2's not just a great superhero movie, it's an incredible film.

Film Assessment: A

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Throwback Thursday Review: 'Spider-Man'

Sorry for the delayed review but I had a test I needed to prepare for that took precedence over this. Anyways, this week I'm beginning a new series of reviews over all the Spider-Man films, starting with the Sam Raimi directed Spider-Man Trilogy followed by The Amazing Spider-Man series, in the lead-up to Spider-Man: Homecoming this July. Next week I'll be beginning another series of reviews over the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise starting with Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. Both series of reviews are evenly distributed till the release of their subsequent new installments and you can find a breakdown of my entire planned schedule for this year's Throwback Thursday Reviews at my Third Year Anniversary Post. Reviews over new releases you can expect for the remainder of February include The Great WallA Cure for Wellness, and Get Out.

'Spider-Man' Review


Nominated For: Best Visual Effects and Best Sound. 

Spider-Man tells the origin story of Peter Parker, an everyday high school nerd who gains spider-like abilities after being bitten by a radioactive spider. At first he's a little reckless with his powers, but once tragedy strikes he takes the words of his altruistic Uncle Ben to heart that "with great power comes great responsibility" to become the amazing Spider-Man. When the nefarious Green Goblin begins to terrorize New York, Spider-Man must stand up against the Goblin's reign of tyranny if he's to protect those closest to him. 
Chances are you yawned while reading that brief synopsis because let's face it, just about everyone is familiar with Spider-Man's origin story. We're currently on our third incarnation of the web-head and have seen the origin story play out twice thus far. I remember watching this film and its subsequent installments over and over again growing up (Yes... even Spider-Man 3...) so I could have easily just slapped together a review of how I remembered Spider-Man but decided it'd be more interesting to revisit them objectively as I do with all these Throwback Thursday Reviews. 
Spider-Man was the first take on the friendly, neighborhood wall-crawler to be directed by Sam Raimi. Raimi is perhaps most well known for his work on both this trilogy and The Evil Dead franchise and it's surprising to look back and see how much he was able to carry over from low budget filmmaking roots to big budget superhero escapades. Raimi executed as much in-camera action as possible, inviting a feeling of visceral excitement to the stunt and camera work showcased in Spider-Man
Obviously, visual effects are required to allow Spider-Man to swing through the concrete jungle and I have to say that those hold up surprisingly well in comparison to what I was expecting. Raimi and screenwriter David Koepp do a wonderful job spinning their own web of original storytelling that maintains integrity to both the source material and the film itself. I've got to give them props for keeping the story personal instead of going for large scale spectacle. Raimi's Spider-Man is unabashedly fun, almost as though it leapt straight out of the '60s comic books. 
On occasion, Spider-Man ventures so far down that avenue it becomes an outright cartoon but its such an excellent translation of silly source material that it can be easily forgiven. One aspect that I feel to constantly be overlooked is the costuming in Spider-Man. Both Spider-Man and Green Goblin have fantastic costumes, sure you could say that there's absolutely no way a teenager would be able to make a suit like that (something somewhat rectified in later takes on the character) or that the Goblin looked like he walked on set in between shooting for a Power Rangers episode, but they're realistic renderings of Steve Ditko's art work. An area in which Spider-Man triumphs in comparison to later incarnations thus far is the Danny Elfman score (Fingers crossed Michael Giacchino is able to deliver in Spider-Man: Homecoming though). Elfman's score has a sense of adventure, otherworldliness, and simply is a deserving theme for such an iconic character. 
Speaking of iconic characters, just about every superhero has an alter-ego or some secret identity, meaning any actor portraying one needs to showcase both sides of that coin. Now this isn't necessarily beholden to ALL superheroes but certainly is true for these three; Batman (Bruce Wayne), Superman (Clark Kent), and Spider-Man (Peter Parker). Tobey Maguire's a fine actor and all but I've never quite latched onto him as Spider-Man, he really captures the heart and soul of the awkward nerdy Peter Parker but for me he never quite hit the mark as the witty web-slinger. 
For some odd reason, his dialogue delivery just sounds monotonous, he simply doesn't sound excited. Perhaps you can say his dialogue is muffled since he's delivering dialogue through a mask but I was able to clearly understand everything he was saying in the suit so that wasn't the issue. When he's throwing out quips it just doesn't feel in the moment or click the way other actors have recently demonstrated in the role, which is probably why everyone loved Maguire in the role at the time. He wasn't being compared to others yet, he was the first to get a crack at it. 
The supporting ensemble that surrounded Maguire had its highs and lows but were certainly a capable cast. Kirsten Dunst nails both the spunky go-getter girl and sensitive sides of Mary Jane Watson as you see she almost adapts her personality to who she hangs around, something I've seen to be surprisingly accurate about teenage girls. However, her character is written the archetypal damsel-in-distress and love interest so she doesn't really have much to work with in this first chapter. James Franco's fine as Peter's best friend Harry Osborn but almost feels like a cardboard cutout or shell of a person, something that's significantly improved in the subsequent franchise entries. 
Cliff Robertson and Rosemary Harris provide endearing, sweet elderly mentor figures for Peter as Uncle Ben and Aunt May while J.K. Simmons perfectly embodies the snarky cigar chewing Daily Bugle editor J. Jonah Jameson. Simmons channels the flippant frustration in a way that I doubt could ever be replicated and stands as one of the greatest comic book film casting choices of all time alongside Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark and Hugh Jackman as Wolverine to name a few. 
Last but not least, Willem Dafoe brings an unhinged fiend into the proceedings as Norman Osborn or the Green Goblin. Dafoe practically oozes menace and showcases fine acting abilities in scenes that evoke the Gollum/Sméagol dynamic from Lord of the Rings or even James McAvoy's work in Split to a lesser degree for a more recent comparison. Dafoe really sells the campy nature of Green Goblin in such a way that you can almost relate to what drove him down such a twisted path. 
In summary, Spider-Man remains a great superhero film thanks to some spectacular filmmaking and talented ensemble but it does have its problems. In retrospect, most of my issues with Spider-Man are relative nitpicks when juxtaposed to the grand scheme of things and some can easily be cast off in favor of watching the film with nostalgia goggles on but its hard to ignore these problems when they stick out like a sore thumb fifteen years later. The iconic moments may live on and stand the test of time but Spider-Man's weaknesses do not. 
Spider-Man may not quite hold up to the standards of modern comic-book based blockbusters we see today from Marvel Studios or Fox's Marvel division like The AvengersGuardians of the GalaxyDeadpool, or Captain America: Civil War, but for its time Spider-Man was one of the best superhero flicks swinging around! 

Film Assessment: B

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

'Hidden Figures' Review

Nominated For: Best Picture, Best Supporting Actress; Octavia Spencer, and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Hidden Figures is based on a book written by Margot Lee Shetterly that tells the true story of a trio of black women who worked at NASA and their contributions to the 1960s space race that have since been overlooked. I went into Hidden Figures somewhat concerned it would get too preachy with it's messages and wind up being a cliché bio-pic meant for television but thankfully it proved to be much more than that. 
Director Theodore Melfi is able to maintain a lighthearted tone while dealing with serious subject matter in regards to segregation and the screenplay Melfi pens alongside Allison Schroeder effectively incorporates the time period to convey the film's weightier messages. Hidden Figures finds itself juggling a lot with three major characters each getting a substantial arc, the various NASA missions, a romantic element, and a thing or two to say about segregation but the screenwriting duo don't allow the multitude of plot elements to ever overtake one another and strike a nice balance. 
The messages about discrimination are kept as a through line but never feel overbearing to the point where it entrenches on other story beatsThe cinematography and editing were masterfully done by director of photography Mandy Walker and editor Peter Teschner and some other areas in which Hidden Figures shone was in the costuming and production design. 
The score composed by Benjamin Wallfisch, Pharrell Williams, and Hans Zimmer is incredibly fun and fitting for the time period with a '60s-'70s early pop vibe, however it feels like it was put together by the former and rarely felt Zimmer-esque. That's not to say I disliked the soundtrack but rather that when I listen to one of my favorite composers' pieces I'm typically able to recognize the artist who worked on it based on musical stylings. I can say that I would have never guessed that Zimmer worked on this since Zimmer's compositions are commonly epic and grandiose in nature. Contrasting that, Hidden Figures does have it's fair share of cliché moments that you will see coming from a mile away but they're few and far between and the material's elevated by the stellar cast. 
Taraji P. Henson, Janelle Monáe, and Octavia Spencer are a terrific tightly-knit trio with charisma and standout moments aplenty. Henson demonstrates great range playing Katherine G. Johnson in a more reserved capacity as the shy, intelligent hard worker till she breaks and vents the characters' frustrations, an incredible scene that feels remarkably human and speaks to the struggles that accompany segregation. Monáe is the spunkiest of the group as Mary Jackson and Spencer is the wiser and older companion that's always thinking ahead.
Kevin Costner took what could have easily been a one dimensional caricature with the fictional NASA director Al Harrison (an amalgamation of NASA directors) and provides a more layered supporting portrayal. Costner actually delivers one of the best lines I've heard in recent memory when he says "Here at NASA we all pee the same color." Jim Parsons and Kirsten Dunst both play similar supporting roles in the narrative as prejudiced whites within NASA as Parsons' Paul Stafford comes across as a ridiculously mean Sheldon Cooper and Dunst's Vivian Mitchell evokes the stereotypical snobby superior.
Mahershala Ali dominated 2016 with screen-stealing work in both Marvel/Netflix's Luke Cage and critical darling Moonlight and his subdued role in Hidden Figures proved to be no exception (I'm considering Hidden Figures a 2016 release due to it's eligibility in last years awards race and the fact it had a limited release in late December, only recently expanding). Ali's screen time is limited but his presence is not as he plays the delightfully charming Colonel Jim Johnson with ease. 
Hidden Figures launched past my expectations thanks to a well-balanced script, capable direction, a fun soundtrack, and an incredible ensemble cast. Hidden Figures balances it's story arcs and solves it's problems with the precision of the most skilled mathematician resulting in a charming feature that uncovers a true story worth telling. 


Film Assessment: B+