'A Quiet Place: Part II' Review

Synopsis: Following the events at home, the Abbott family now face the terrors of the outside world. Forced to venture into the unknown, they realize the creatures that hunt by sound are not the only threats lurking beyond the sand path.

Runtime: 97 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for terror, violence, and bloody/disturbing images)

Who should see it? Fans of sci-fi horror and the first film.

Written and directed by John Krasinski, A Quiet Place: Part II picks up right where A Quiet Place left off. The first film snuck up on me as I was amazed that "Jim from The Office" had the sensibilities of a great horror director. Sequels are even trickier to pull off, especially in the shadow of such a fresh, original concept, so I once again tempered my expectations. The follow-up to Krasinski's 2018 mainstream horror hit was supposed to be experienced by audiences over a year ago. In fact, I had tickets to a double feature screening last March that was canceled about a week beforehand as cinemas shut down around the world in response to COVID-19. Naturally, I eagerly awaited the day I'd get to see the sequel. And I'm glad to say that day finally arrived as theaters appear to now be on the upswing!

In A Quiet Place: Part II, viewers get to explore more of the post-apocalyptic landscape teased by the first film. As the world expands, it's quite evident that the budget did as well. For one, there are more sets and locations for the family to explore, and the monsters are shown onscreen much more frequently. Krasinski also demonstrates a more refined control of the camera as the technical filmmaking gets a boost as well. Narratively, I was relieved that Part II never felt like it was retreading its predecessor. Like the first film, the story is simple but effective. Krasinski even develops a plethora of uniquely intense circumstances for his cast to face and ensure viewers are on the edge of their seats. 

Something I didn't previously consider was that fending off the monsters would seem easier this time around since the Abbott family discovered their weakness at the end of the prior installment. I was surprised to see how Krasinski ensured the characters would remain vulnerable and face plenty of hair-raising challenges. The fight is more balanced, but the odds are not always in the Abbott family's favor as they struggle to survive. Krasinski also found creative solutions that allowed for more dialogue as opposed to the few spoken words in the first film. The sound design is once again the star of this sequel, as the hushed atmosphere ushers in a feeling of uneasiness at what's to come.  

The quaint ensemble from the original film return, with a baby in tow and the notable additions of Cillian Murphy and Djimon Hounsou. Though Emily Blunt gets top billing, Millicent Simmonds is undoubtedly the film's lead. Simmonds astounded me in the original film but continues to impress here with a remarkably nuanced performance. That said, each member of the Abbott family is given time to shine, and Blunt, Murphy, Simmonds, and Jupe lend plenty of gravitas to this creature feature. If you watch the films back-to-back, it is admittedly noticeable that Noah Jupe and Millicent Simmonds aged between filming. However, I prefer suspending disbelief over any uncanny digital de-aging. 

A Quiet Place: Part II may not match the emotional heights of the first, but the thrills, story, and character work are just as gripping. Without the element of surprise, Part II proves itself to be a sequel worthy of impassioned discussion. 

Film Assessment: A-

Throwback Thursday Review: 'Inception'

Sorry for the extreme delay in publishing this review. Before I begin, I'd like to update my readers on what's been going on behind the scenes. First off, I came up with an interesting idea for this review, but it just never took off, so that got abandoned. Secondly, Hurricane Harvey struck the Houston area back in August. This threw me off, of course, and I scarcely had time to sit down and work on reviews, much less any of my delayed ones. However, a sense of normalcy has long since established itself so I'm getting on to publishing these dreadfully delayed reviews online ASAP. Reviews you can expect to see in the near future include a Triple-R for Interstellar and Throwback Thursday Reviews over Stand By Me, The World's End, The Shining, the 1990 It miniseries, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, and Risky Business (1983).

'Inception' Review

Nominated For: Best Picture, Best Cinematography, Best Original Screenplay, Best Visual Effects, Best Art Direction, Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, and Best Original Score.

Won: Best Cinematography, Best Visual Effects, Best Sound Editing, and Best Sound Mixing.

Inception follows Dom Cobb, a thief who utilizes shared dream technology to enter people's minds and steal secrets from their subconscious. This skill makes him incredibly useful in the world of corporate espionage, but has also been accompanied by substantial personal consequences for Cobb. While on an assignment, he's offered a chance at redemption so that he can finally return home and see his children again. All Cobb has to do is assemble a team to infiltrate the mind of a CEO and implant an idea in his mind. The task seems inconceivable, but the reward far outweighs the risk for Cobb, so he accepts and the quest to pull off the most impractical mind heist begins.

Inception was written and directed by auteur filmmaker Christopher Nolan, standing as his seventh feature length film and first follow up to the massive success of The Dark Knight. I think every successful storyteller has a defining point in their career where they prove themselves capable of more than just making remarkable movies, but also expanding exceptional, original ideas into fantastic feature length projects. For Nolan, I believe Inception is his quintessential film. 

I'm not necessarily stating Inception is his best work, but I believe it to be one of the defining points of his phenomenal filmography. I still haven't seen Following, Memento, Insomnia, or The Prestige so I can't quite speak on how those films impacted his career trajectory, but I do believe Inception exemplifies all the aforementioned points. 

For starters, everything originated from one of the most unique ideas ever brought to film that presents infinite opportunity for elaboration and development. What if people were able to infiltrate one-another's dreams? What would the implications of that be? What are the rules? Nolan knows all, and the fact he thought this all up still astounds me. It's wonderful world-building from the group up, and Nolan realizes he's gotta break it down for the viewer so he cleverly incorporates exposition in an incredibly interesting way. He shows as he tells, explaining the fundamentals clearly and concisely for those providing their full attention and willingness to think.  

Nolan doesn't forget that the human mind is complex though. He remembers that the past haunts us and our personal trauma will always trail behind, so he brilliantly pushes that idea forward as the driving narrative for our protagonist. The base premise of Inception centers on a heist, but at its core the film is all about letting go of the past. The way Nolan integrates this thread with the overarching story is utterly exceptional. The stakes in Inception remain personal in spite of elevated spectacle. Rather than focusing the film's climax entirely on the heist at hand, Nolan pits Cobb against the personal demons of his past, and forces him to confront them in an intense, emotionally charged resolution. 

Like nearly all of Nolan's other films, Inception is a masterpiece on a technical level with splendid cinematography, impressive editing, proficient practical production design, absolutely authentic visual effects work, superb sound mixing and editing, and a booming score from Hans Zimmer. There's not a single technical category that slouches amidst Nolan's especially ambitious magnum opus, and absolutely all of these involved elements have gone on to be incredibly influential (just look to last year's Doctor Strange for evidence of that).

Time is a reoccurring element in virtually all of Nolan's work. Though the way Nolan compounds time within the layers of dreams in Inception's pivotal dream-heist is simply astounding. Every talked-about technical technique accentuates the tension and importance of the cerebral stickup, but the sense of urgency is only emphasized and amplified by these filmmaking instruments, not fabricated by it. This perception that time elongates within each layer is best communicated through the slo-motion sequencing and tempo fluctuations in Zimmer's score. 

As for Inception's illustrious ensemble, the all-star talent bring their A-game. Accomplished actors including Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Tom Hardy, Ken Watanabe, Dileep Rao, Cillian Murphy, and Michael Caine each provide sufficient substance to their respective roles and make especially favorable impressions with every moment onscreen. 

However, it's Leonardo DiCaprio and Marion Cotillard who practically run away with the movie. DiCaprio absolutely authenticates Cobb's struggle to distinguish fiction from reality, and the fact his mind is constantly responsible for undermining his plans only strengthens the struggle. One outburst from him, in particular, is so powerful that you can feel Cobb's pain resonate through the screen. It's one of DiCaprio's few performances that exemplifies such a poignant balance between intellect, emotion, and subtle nuance. Cotillard is able to match him emotional beat-for-emotional beat though, demonstrating a strengthened resolve and etherealness to play Mel as a faint shadow of the woman Cobb remembers loving. She finds a strange sweet-spot between seeming real and unreal, so the viewer (like Cobb) will also have difficulty differentiating the hallucinations from flesh and blood.

Aside from expanding audience's minds in 2010, Inception stretched the limits of efficiently executing and innovating a director's most inconceivable abstraction. I realize I've used adjectives like "brilliant," "exceptional," and "astounding" quite often in this review, but there's simply no other way to describe Nolan's craftsmanship. He continually pushes the boundaries of every element of filmmaking to consistently deliver intellectually-stimulating entertainment. Inception remains to be ample evidence of just that, and so much more!

Film Assessment: A+

'Dunkirk' Review

Nominated For: Best Picture, Best Director; Christopher Nolan, Best Film Editing, Best Cinematography, Best Production Design, Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, and Best Original Score.

Won: Best Film Editing, Best Sound Editing, and Best Sound Mixing.

The year is 1940 and Allied forces fighting in World War II have been driven back to the beaches of Dunkirk. The Germans have the British and French soldiers surrounded and the only hope of survival is an impossible escape. That's the dire circumstances our heroes find themselves in at the start of Dunkirk. Dunkirk then depicts the attempted evacuation of over 300,000 men by land, sea, and air.

Dunkirk is written and directed by auteur filmmaker Christopher Nolan, a man whose work's powerful enough to speak for itself. You're probably familiar with Nolan's other highly regarded films such as Inception, Interstellar, and The Dark Knight Trilogy, but you may not know that Nolan has yet to be nominated in the category of "Best Director" at the annual Academy Awards, or even win an Oscar for that matter (although he's received nominations for Best Picture and Best Original Screenplay and his films have faired well in the technical categories with a number of wins). 

Well, that's all about to change because there's absolutely no way the Academy would dare snub his work displayed in Dunkirk. While we still have a ways to go in regards to awards season, and it's a little early to speculate, I have yet to see any formidable competition arise. Dunkirk marks Nolan's first foray into the war genre and his experience with a big budget and practical effects carried over quite nicely. Nolan is accustomed putting his own spin on all his productions, and Dunkirk is no exception because Dunkirk is unlike any war film I've ever seen.

In Dunkirk, emphasis is placed on the event rather than the characters. You don't get the opportunity to know these heroes because Nolan thrusts the audience straight into the ensuing chaos. Dunkirk represents a glimpse of the events "in-the-moment" and I must say, I was enraptured from the get-go. There's no time to sit around the fire and talk about what's waiting back home because this is a struggle-for-survival. Time is of the essence for these soldiers and nothing communicates that better than a ticking timepiece, which Hans Zimmer impressively embedded into his swirling, epic score. Nolan then ensures that everything ranging from shot composition-to-an actor's expression conveys a sense of urgency to match Zimmer's harmonic pulses and it all culminates in a heart-pounding pressure cooker.

Dunkirk is probably the most expensive and authentic recreation of said-evacuation that divides its focus among three interwoven chapters, despite the fact each takes place at a different point in time;

1. The Mole, One Week.

2. The Sea, One Day.    

3. The Air, One Hour.    

Eventually, all of these ongoing events overlap and there are certainly some interesting intersections which your eyes will be more attuned to after an initial viewing. You'll find yourself thinking "Haven't I seen that already?" upon realizing the chapter title cards signified the location and duration of each chapter. On that note, it's worth mention that the dictionary defines a mole as a large solid structure on a shore serving as a pier, breakwater, or causeway (but there's also an underlying double-meaning that you should be able to wrap your mind around if you pay enough attention).

Occasionally the same events are shown a second or third time from one of the other primary perspectives and in an ordinary war-film that might wear the viewer down. However, this is Nolan we're talking about, and only a director with Nolan's skill and attention to detail is capable of captivating audiences with an intense inter-weaving of three different accounts. Even though Nolan is depicting the same event three times from a different perspective, he manages to integrate an overwhelming intensity that carries over nicely when he transitions among the tri-arched chronology. 

The performances across the board are certainly good, but are admittedly handicapped by Nolan's narrative. Nolan extrapolates some exceptional acting from his cast but I'll be honest in saying I had a hard time pinpointing particular stand-outs. The acting is largely reactionary and while the actors' work is commendable, no single performer blew me away. Fionn Whitehead, Aneurin Barnard, and Harry Styles showcased a surprising amount of range as the soldiers headlining the mole chapter, but none of them aren't offered enough character exploration for you to be entirely invested in the men-at-arms. Nolan has gone on the record comparing the casting of Styles to his decision to have Heath Ledger portray the Joker, but I'll go ahead and set the record straight that his performance is good, but nowhere near the leagues of Ledger's legendary turn. Familiar faces consisting of Mark Rylance, Cillian Murphy, Kenneth Branagh, and James D'Arcy are also to be found among the ensemble and each actor carried their weight well.

Elsewhere, Tom Hardy once again finds his face obstructed by some sort of mask in Dunkirk and I did find it difficult to interpret exactly what he was saying on occasion. However, Hardy did a tremendous job expressing himself with essentially only his eyes. If you thought some frequent Nolan collaborators were missing from my breakdown of the performances, then listen carefully for Michael Caine's voice as it turns up once in the film's first act. 

Dunkirk is one of the year's most meticulously made movies that's undoubtedly elevated by the IMAX format. Nolan makes good use of the enormous screen's full aspect ratio and the spectacular sound design really explodes in IMAX's thunderous sound system. The heftier ticket price of an IMAX screening is certainly worth it and if you only plan on seeing Dunkirk only once, I'd go with the IMAX experience. However, the 70 MM print is also not to be missed for cinema enthusiasts as it was quite cool to see something projected on actual film opposed to the standard digital projection found in most theaters today. If you're curious, I saw Dunkirk in 70MM for my first go-around and my second viewing was in IMAX. I'd personally advise you to do the same because there's a lot you'll pick up on that you may not have noticed the first time around. But if you have to choose, pick IMAX.

In conclusion, Dunkirk is an exceptional example of why I found filmmaking so fascinating in the first place. In the hands of a less-capable artist, the events at Dunkirk would have probably come across as boring or generic, but Nolan's insistence to tell this story through unconventional means enables an intense, immersive experience you'd be hard-pressed to emulate or liken to anything else.

Film Assessment: A

'Free Fire' Review

Free Fire follows the break-out of a fervent firefight once an arms deal goes awry. Straight from the get-go, writer-director Ben Wheatley establishes a Tarantino-esque tone, premise, and setting inhabited by tough wisecrackers who could've walked straight off the set of Reservoir Dogs or Pulp Fiction. Even though the plot and setting of Free Fire calls a few of Quentin Tarantino classics to mind, Wheatley manages to distance his film enough that it never retreads familiar ground.

Free Fire is very much it's own thing, a quirky hour and half crossfire. I'll let you know now not to expect much beyond the shoot-out and preceding set-up because there's little to no traditional plot structure in Free Fire once the insanity ensues. The constant crossfire does grow tiring in some moments but as soon as you're about to check out, you'll be brought back in by the outrageous antics these characters carry out. The cinematography employed also involves a number of cool camera tricks to make up for the lower budget and maintain the intense energy throughout the firefight.

Due to the film's smaller budget and the confines of the space allowed, there aren't any particularly memorable stunts or action beats but the captivating characters more than make up for this. The screenplay penned by Wheatley and co-writer Amy Jump doesn't explore the characters too deeply and that actually works in the film's favor because you're not quite sure who'll make it out alive when everything's all said and done.

The script quickly takes a turn towards over-the-top ridiculousness and Free Fire becomes an outright comedy when the aim of these characters is so poor that they can't hit one another from ten feet away. There's something sadistically entertaining about watching these characters confined to close-quarters conflict because the characters are charismatic scoundrels. You dislike them because who they are or what they've done, but you won't be able to help but enjoy every minute they're taunting and shooting at one another. Free Fire's got quite the arsenal in terms of its accomplished cast featuring the likes of Brie Larson, Armie Hammer, Jack Reynor, Cillian Murphy, and Sharlto Copley. Everyone puts forth a commendable performance but Hammer and Copley stood out for their particular personalities as the levelheaded and kooky individuals respectively.

There's not really much else to say about Free Fire due to the simple, self-explanatory premise. If this sounds interesting to you, then I say it's worth checking out. If not, then this simply isn't for you. I'd say Free Fire took its shot and hit its mark because Free Fire turned out to be exactly what I wanted; a delightful over-the-top self-contained shoot-em-up.

Film Assessment: B

Throwback Thursday Review: 'Batman Begins'

Sorry for the delayed review but this week I'm beginning my series of Throwback Thursday Reviews of the Dark Knight Trilogy. I'm spreading these reviews throughout the year given the release of some new DC Comic Films of both Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad. My main Throwback Thursday Review that will come the week Batman V. Superman: Dawn Of Justice is released will be Man Of Steel, since it's both a Superman origin and the only film in DC's current cinematic universe. However I wanted to do both a Batman origin film as well as review the Dark Knight Trilogy this year so I figured Batman Begins was a great compromise. The reason this review is coming this week as opposed to closer to Batman V. Superman: Dawn Of Justice's release is that from this week onward my schedule is booked for Throwback Thursday Reviews till August.

'Batman Begins' Review

Nominated For: Best Cinematography.

Batman Begins is the foundation for Christopher Nolan's brilliant Dark Knight Trilogy, and a rather solid foundation if ever there was one. Nolan broke ground for superhero films by being the first to take one completely seriously with a very realistic, grounded take on the Caped Crusader's origin story.

Christopher Nolan takes up the duties of director in addition to penning the script alongside  David Goyer, deciding to focus on character and story rather than spectacle going to the roots of the Batman and it's a wise decision. Nolan also makes the choice to utilize practical effects rather than CGI that leads to more authentic action sequences.

This practicality also oozes over in regards to Batman's arsenal gadgets and this version of the bat mobile, the Tumbler, that's more along the lines of a tank. I feel that the practical gadgets make perfect sense and love the explanation behind each trinket that Batman carries along with him. I also liked their use and purpose in various action sequences and felt that they certainly service the film.

One notable action sequence features the Tumbler abandoning the roads and resorting to jumping over rooftops as Batman is being frantically pursued by the authorities, and it was incredible.

Now, with that being said, this film does indeed have a few hiccups with a bit of lackluster action at times, but the film makes up for all with a phenomenal character-focused narrative. Another key piece to Nolan's larger puzzle are the performances being showcased.

Front and center we have Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne and I felt he is certainly serviceable in the duality of the role, bringing both a suave Wayne and an edgy Batman. Now, many critics are a little harsh on Bale's "Batman voice," which sounds like more of a growl, but it makes logical sense to me that Wayne would need to disguise his voice to avoid being recognize in his escapades.

Also, the film makes a point to establish that this version of Wayne uses the playboy persona as more of a mask rather than the cowl itself, and I liked that concept and how it's developed across the course of the Trilogy.

The film's supporting cast are where the performances are just exceptional. Michael Caine brings new depths to Alfred showing that Wayne's butler is not only concerned with Bruce's safety but protecting the Wayne legacy as well. Caine is exceptional in the role as a phenomenal casting choice.

Morgan Freeman portrays Lucius Fox and his character is given more prominence than ever before in any adaptation, where it's explained Fox supplies the gadgets to Wayne and Freeman is phenomenal as per usual.

Now, Gary Oldman was the perfect match for Jim Gordon as he not only shared a physical resemblance to the cop, but also the emotional core of the character.

Katie Holmes plays the main love interest for Wayne as Rachel Dawes, and sadly is of little use to the story, only to serve at the damsel of distress in some of the darkest moments. Holmes is decent in the role, but you'll see she's easily replaced for the sequel.

In regards to villains, the film holds an ace up it's sleeve with Liam Neeson by hiding his true importance for most of the film, but the reveal of who he's playing is quite satisfying. Neeson acts as a great mentor and opposition to Wayne that's integral to the film and later brings the narrative full circle in the closing act of the Dark Knight Trilogy.

Cillian Murphy brings the first live action version of the Scarecrow to the screen, and oh, boy is he terrifying. Murphy plays second fiddle to the main antagonist but is terrific when utilized.

Christopher Nolan's interpretation of the Caped Crusader is really one of the greatest superhero origin stories to be told, that serviced the source material while making it accessible to the mainstream public.

Film Assessment: A-