Saturday, July 28, 2018

'Mission: Impossible - Fallout' Review

Mission: Impossible - Fallout accompanies Ethan Hunt and the IMF team as they join forces with CIA assassin August Walker to prevent a disaster of epic proportions. With the fate of the world at stake, the group find themselves in the ultimate race against time as their virtue is tested like never before after a mission gone wrong.
Mission: Impossible - Fallout is the sixth installment in the long-running spy series and also the first film in the franchise to carry the same director. Previously, each addition to the franchise was spearheaded by a different director and they were loosely connected to one another. However, Christopher McQuarrie broke the mold by returning to write and direct Fallout as the first direct sequel in the series after his excellent work on Rogue Nation. Since Tom Cruise is a prominent producer in addition to being the series' lead actor, I believe his close affiliation with Cruise may have helped him stick around, but it's equally likely he was the first director to have been offered and accepted a consecutive gig.
By tightly securing Fallout to the five prior films, McQuarrie is able to explore an interesting idea that Hunt's noblest intentions could be coupled with unforeseen consequences. The choices from Ethan's past resurface to haunt him, so the question is posed whether Hunt should compromise his morality for the sake of completing a mission more efficiently. It's a fascinating way to deconstruct the tortured psychology of one of America's greatest action heroes because Hunt is pushed to his limits here. Compounding with whatever his current dilemma may be, a new problem arises and the situation suddenly intensifies. This builds and builds over two and a half hours, amounting to one of the most intense, unrelenting experiences I've ever had in a cinema. The stakes escalate and escalate as the situation becomes more and more dire. Believe it or not, but this is the first time that the mission's actually felt impossible.


As a brief aside, here's a tweet of mine from Thursday night where I described my immediate reaction to the film as best I could. Given my initial impression and the immense hype surrounding this spy sequel, I knew I needed to see the film a second time to confirm my suspicions before I said anything that could be perceived as being too reactionary.
With that being said, there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that Mission: Impossible - Fallout is one of the greatest action films I've ever seen in the cinema. Believe the hype folks because this is an exhilarating, non-stop adrenaline rush that truly warrants comparisons to The Dark Knight and Mad Max: Fury Road. It's that good...
McQuarrie and his crew quite literally take the franchise to astonishing new heights as Cruise became the first actor to perform a HALO Jump from 25,000 feet in the air. The gear he's wearing apparently didn't even exist prior to filming because this feat is so unprecedented and requires extensive training... But Cruise is an absolute mad man, and I respect the hell out of his commitment to performing these insane stunts for our amusement. 
Aside from pulling off that baffling stunt, you're probably curious if the action in one of the most consistently entertaining action franchises measured up to everything that had come before. Well, the action, plot, and character all work in tandem to deliver the edge of your seat suspense audiences have come to expect from the series. The technical precision across the board is phenomenal to such a degree that I believe it is well within reason that Fallout could rightfully become the first Mission: Impossible film to be recognized by the Academy in some capacity, whether it simply be an honorary stunt award or a slew of technical nominations. The editing is seamless, Rob Hardy's cinematography is stunning, full of grandiose, sweeping shots that are a wonder to behold, and surely will be talked about for years to come, and Lorne Balfe's swelling score is an unrelenting accompaniment that intensifies the proceedings tenfold.
The action itself includes a bare-knuckled hand-to-hand confrontation in a bathroom, numerous chases through Paris by foot, motorcycle, and car, and an invigorating helicopter sequence. Every sequence packs a visceral punch as not only some of the best work in the franchise, but some of the best-executed action I've ever witnessed. Oh, and by the way, that image above showcases Cruise jumping between buildings and he broke his ankle mere moments later. But it doesn't stop there... Cruise broke his ankle, got up, and kept going. That's the take they used in the finished film.
Like the last three installments, Fallout is an ensemble effort and everyone brings their A-game once more. Pushing the age of 56, Cruise never ceases to amaze, and I believe he's cemented his status as an all-time great movie star unlike any other. Reprising their respective roles from Rogue Nation are Rebecca Ferguson, Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames, Alec Baldwin, and Sean Harris who each do excellent work. Ferguson is particularly kick-ass in her moments of action, Pegg is much more involved in the actual mission this time around, Rhames fulfills his duties as a loyal friend and crucial part of the team, Baldwin earns his appointment as the newly minted IMF director, and Harris relishes in Solomon Lane's soft-spoken villainy. Lastly, Michelle Monaghan makes her return as Julia and that brings an unexpectedly strong emotional component to the proceedings. Jeremy Renner was noticeably absent, but that was on account of prior obligations to filming Avengers: Endgame. However, that did enable some satisfying substitutions...
Additions to the cast include Henry Cavill, Angela Bassett, and Vanessa Kirby who are all quite impressionable. Bassett is a fitting head of CIA and Kirby makes for an intriguing femme fatale as the enigmatic White Widow. It is Cavill's August Walker who stole the show in my book though. It should come as no surprise that the Man of Steel would project a formidable physical presence, but Cavill exhibits the acting chops to back it up. It was also very fascinating to observe the layers in Cavill's performance on a second viewing. I'd love to see him bring that intensity to Superman. 
One does not simply discuss Cavill's role without touching on the infamous Mustachegate though... For those who aren't aware, Cruise's on-set injury delayed Fallout's production while Justice League underwent reshoots. Warner Bros. either could shave the stache and foot the bill to digitally add it in Fallout or digitally remove it themselves... Paramount refused to allow Cavill to shave the stache, so Warner Bros. was forced into the latter option. That then resulted in the most unnatural human mouth ever seen which has become a huge talking point among fans. I'm not entirely sure that the mustache was necessary to the extent of derailing Justice League, but it looked really cool so who could possibly complain? Aside from that, enjoy this gif of Henry Cavill reloading his fists because it's awesome!
In actuality, Mission: Impossible - Fallout is a fitting title because I believe it’s impossible for me to have a falling out with this franchise considering each successive entry has been progressively better than the last. Mission: Impossible - Fallout is not only the best film in the franchise or the best I've seen this summer... I legitimately believe it to be the best action film I've ever seen and I have no idea how M:I 7 could conceivably top this, but I'd love to see them try at the very least. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to stop whatever you're currently doing and see Mission: Impossible - Fallout on the biggest screen near you as soon as you possibly can!

Film Assessment: A+

Friday, July 27, 2018

Recollection Reflection Review: 'Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation'

I'm cutting it a little close, but I just finished my Mission: Impossible series rewatch the Thursday morning of my Mission: Impossible - Fallout screening. Keep in mind that means it's likely this review and my Fallout review may not be published for a day or two, but I'll try and get them out as soon as I possibly can. I've also promised a review of Teen Titans Go! To The Movies, and that will come in due time, but I'm prioritizing Mission: Impossible content for the time being. Additionally, I will be sharing my thoughts on You Were Never Really Here and Love, Simon sometime before my post disclosing my best and worst films of the year so far. I've also decided to push that post back to give my other reviews some breathing room. I currently am unsure of my review plans for August, but I'll disclose that shortly.

'Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation' Review


Recollection- Mission: Impossible Rogue Nation Review

Reflection- When I first saw Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation in the summer of 2015, it narrowly beat out Ghost Protocol as my new favorite in the franchise. Surprisingly, I haven't really revisited it since then... I don't really have much reason as to why not, but I suppose it's because I simply never got around to it. Anyways, I thought it would be fun to re-evaluate this installment and see if my preference over Ghost Protocol held true.

Review- With the IMF disbanded, the team now faces off against a network of highly skilled special agents known as the Syndicate. These highly trained operatives are hellbent on creative a new world order through an escalating series of terrorist attacks. Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation escorts Ethan Hunt as he gathers his team and joins forces with the shifty, disavowed British intelligence agent Ilsa Faust as the group faces their most impossible mission yet.
Taking the Mission: Impossible baton from Brad Bird, Christopher McQuarrie stepped in to steer the franchise in a new direction. McQuarrie's become a frequent collaborator with Tom Cruise in recent years, so it's really not that surprising that he was enlisted to helm Rogue Nation and then stuck around to write and direct Fallout as well. In doing so, he may have broken a series tradition in which each successive film was lead by a different director. You'll have to wait till I'm finished writing that review to find out if I felt it was worth it, but till then, we can discuss McQuarrie's work here.
With Rogue Nation, McQuarrie blends the mystery and intrigue of old school espionage with the thrilling stunts and character deconstruction found in contemporary spy outings. In doing so, this is the first entry in the franchise that's dared to question Ethan's sanity, although longtime viewers may have already done so as they've witnessed Tom Cruise actually attempt some INSANE stunts. Rogue Nation essentially offers the best elements of each prior installment, and McQuarrie seems to have been inspired to tribute hallmarks of cinema as well. The high speed chase through Casablanca and a Hitchcockian game of cat-and-mouse in the third act indicate this might be the case. 
As for action, the stunning set pieces included in Rogue Nation are incredibly varied from one another and among the very best the series has to offer. There's everything from an elegant throw-down at the Vienna Opera House to a high-octane motorcycle chase through Casablanca. Also prominently featured are a plane sequence that lifts off almost immediately, a cat-and-mouse chase through the streets of London, and a heist that's a bit of a deep dive. 
Cruise's notable stunt this time around was clinging to the side of an A400M plane as it ascended. If you didn't already know, Cruise performs his own stunts so he actually did this (this stunt in particular was HEAVILY publicized). There were safety measures in place of course, but I don't think that makes the feat any less insane or impressive. The sequence itself happens right at the start, kicking off the film with an abundance of jet fuel and gusto. 
Like its predecessor, Rogue Nation is a franchise addition which caters to its ensemble. Once again, Tom Cruise lights up the screen as a hero worth rooting for. Cruise is synonymous with Hunt these days, and he persists as a force to be reckoned with. His charisma and cool attitude prove to be just as potent as Hunt himself. Returning cast members include Simon Pegg, Jeremy Renner, and Ving Rhames who reprise their respective roles as Benji, Brandt, and Luther. All three make the most of every moment onscreen, but Renner and Rhames have notably smaller parts than the rest of the cast. In regards to newcomers, there's two I'll touch on in a second, but Alec Baldwin bodes well in the role of CIA director Alan Hunley, delivering the dialogue "Sir, Hunt is the living manifestation of destiny." like nobody else.
Meanwhile, the big takeaway was (and still is) undoubtedly Rebecca Ferguson's Ilsa Faust. Ferguson depicts the characters as a femme fatale with unclear allegiances, but she dominates every action sequences in which she appears. She's elusive, deadly, and an equal to Hunt who stands apart as her own intriguing individual.
In the antagonistic camp, Sean Harris certainly makes himself known as a villain worth fearing. Harris' Solomon Lane is soft-spoken, but he still manages to be both menacing, twisted, and unpredictable in his approach to the role. There aren't as many villains as subtle as this nowadays, so that makes the performance all the more fascinating.  
At the end of the day, Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation zooms on by as a top-notch entry in the franchise that's thrilling, layered, and able to slightly surpass every installment that came before it.

Film Assessment: A

Recollection Reflection Review: 'Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol'

As of writing this, I've just seen Mission: Impossible - Fallout. I came in right under the wire for my series rewatch as I finished them all the morning of my Fallout screening. The implications being that I'm reviewing the final three films in order of release (Ghost ProtocolRogue Nation, then Fallout). Expect to see all these reviews online within the next few days. I've also promised a review of Teen Titans Go! To The Movies, and that will come in due time, but I'm prioritizing Mission: Impossible content for the time being. Additionally, I will be likely be sharing my thoughts on You Were Never Really Here and Love, Simon sometime before my post disclosing my best and worst films of the year so far. I've also decided to push that post back one last time to give my other reviews some breathing room.

'Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol' Review


Recollection- Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol Review

Reflection- Believe it or not, but Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol was actually the first Mission: Impossible I saw in theaters. When it came out in December of 2011, I had never seen one. Therefore, I wound up marathoning them all at home with family before heading out to see Ghost Protocol. From that day on, I've been a huge fan of the franchise...

Review- Blamed for a terrorist attack on the Kremlin, Ethan Hunt and the entire IMF agency are disavowed by the U.S. government while the president initiates the Ghost Protocol. Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol then accompanies Hunt and his team as they're forced to go off the grid and clear the agency's name by preventing another attack.
As the fourth franchise installment, Ghost Protocol carried on the series' trend of enlisting fresh blood to direct. In this scenario, Brad Bird was brought up to the blockbuster big leagues having previously only directed animated films (The Iron GiantThe Incredibles, and Ratatouille). For his live action debut, Bird made one hell of an impression though... It's been seven years and many still consider Ghost Protocol to be their favorite in the franchise for good reason. This isn't all too surprising when you consider the exceptional work already under his belt at the time, but it goes to show that it's possible to stick the landing while making the leap to live action from an extensive background in animation.
Like those who came before him, Bird understands the inner workings of this franchise, so he amplifies those elements while offering his own unique style and sensibility as a filmmaker. Working with a screenplay penned by Josh Appelbaum and André Nemec, Bird ensures the action is propulsive with a never-ending sense of urgency. It moves at a quick pace, but that's totally in the film's favor because the two hours and twelve minutes fly by in the blink of an eye. 
The action's always on the move in conjunction with the plot. It does so without feeling rushed because you're entirely invested in the outcome as an extension of caring for the characters. You can feel the weight of the world on their shoulders because Bird and his crew do an exceptional job at communicating the dire circumstances facing this team. 
This installment also has some of the franchise's niftiest gadgets and gizmos, but there's a recurring bit where their devices malfunction mid-mission. In turn, the set pieces are all the more enthralling due to the uncertain reliability of the team's gear. On occasion, action flicks can be bogged down by mundane exposition on rewatch, but even the exposition in Ghost Protocol is quite exciting after all this time! The demonstrations of the tech are handled in such a way that they're interesting to watch as well as being informative. You're simultaneously wowed by the tools at the team's disposal and intrigued at discovering exactly how they function. It's a tricky balance, but Bird pulls it off.
For Cruise's ludicrous stunt, this time around he decided to actually scale the world's tallest structure (2,717 feet tall). The Burj Khalifa sequence still ranks among the series' strongest set pieces because Bird and his crew film it in such a way that it feels like you're hanging onto the skyscraper with Cruise. While Cruise himself may have been suspended by some cables while filming, Hunt is free climbing the hotel with defective adhesive gloves. There's an impending sense of dread that he could fall at any moment, and he actually does a few times only to get a hold moments before a fatal plummet... By then, your heart's leapt out of your chest and the hairs on your arm are firmly at attention. 
And I haven't even properly recognized the wonderful work from cinematographer Robert Elswit, editor Paul Hirsch, composer Michael Giacchino, the sound designers, production designers, visual effects artists, and stunt coordinators. It still perplexes me that no entry in this franchise has at least been recognized with an Oscar nomination in the technical categories because the crew does such exceptional work here, proving to be among the best in their respective fields. I suppose it could be the blockbuster stigma, but Transformers: Dark of the Moon was nominated over this for Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, and Best Visual Effects... While I'll admit to enjoying that film more than most, that's undeniably one of the Academy's worst cardinal sins... Right next to La La Land losing out Best Picture after mistakenly being announced as the winner a year and a half ago. You can bet I'm still bitter about it too.
Another interesting aspect of Ghost Protocol is that it's much more of an ensemble piece than previous efforts. It's certainly still lead by Tom Cruise, but it fleshes out the supporting cast like no prior entry in the series and the mission requires an all-around team effort this time. Cruise is charming and cool in the role of Ethan Hunt as per usual, but he pushes himself even harder in regards to the physicality of his performance. He infamously does his own stunts and really put himself through the wringer on this one. By his side, Simon Pegg's Benji has a more prominent role than he did in Mission: Impossible III (providing most of the comedic relief) while Paula Patton and Jeremy Renner are the new recruits. Both Patton and Renner leave a favorable impression in regards to playing interesting allies, but only Renner has reprised his role in a later film thus far. Meanwhile, Michael Nyqvist's Hendricks is an antagonist with a strong screen presence, but ultimately lacks enough characterization or screentime to leave much of an impression.
It's a testament to the quality of Ghost Protocol that it still stands out in an action franchise that's as consistently entertaining as Mission: Impossible. Seven years later, and it's still clinging on as one of the series' best. 

Film Assessment: A

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

'The Equalizer 2' Review

The Equalizer 2 shadows the mysterious and elusive former black ops operative Robert McCall as he goes above and beyond to serve justice on behalf of the powerless and oppressed. When those closest to McCall are put in harms way and matters get personal, McCall sets off on a warpath to find the individuals responsible and make them pay. 
Chronicling the second chapter of McCall's story, director Antoine Fuqua and screenwriter Richard Wenk each reprise their respective duties from The Equalizer. Over the span of Washington's forty-one year acting career, he's yet to play the same part twice... Till now. Believe it or not, but The Equalizer 2 is actually the first sequel for both Fuqua and celebrated actor Denzel Washington in addition to being their fourth collaboration together. Once you've taken that information in consideration, it's easy to imagine that Fuqua and Washington are very selective about their projects. They are both respected names in Hollywood after all... Therefore, it would seem reasonable that they each saw potential in Wenk's script that compelled them to return. Because why else would you go down the sequel route?...
Well, after seeing The Equalizer 2, I think their reasoning was much simpler... A nice paycheck seems to have been the primary incentive for this series continuation which is jam-packed with problems. First and foremost, the sequel centers around an unfocused narrative that's bogged down by a plethora of plot lines, lots of location hopping, an abundance of action clichés, and the blandest baddies I've seen in awhile. The plot also unravels at a plodding, methodical pace so large stretches of the film are unbelievable boring. There are certainly spurts of action here and there, but none of the activity is interesting enough to leave much of an impression. The action is not particularly well-shot or edited either, which made the fight choreography difficult to follow and left me with a headache as opposed to a grin. 
There's also a persisting question as to why the characters behave the way they do. The climactic action set-piece takes place during a full blown hurricane as the beachfront town's been evacuated, and I wondered who in their right mind would willingly follow someone into such a storm. Of course, the antagonists do so with the typical "tying up loose ends" motivation, but I didn't quite buy that as a compelling enough reason... Additionally, the storm made for such a drab background that it was very tiring to watch, and the occasional poor green-screen work didn't help matters. 
Furthermore, Robert McCall is a Lyft driver this time around. This functions as a plot device for McCall to interact with members of the surrounding community and as the shameless product placement you're suspecting it to be. There's even a bit about a five star rating that simultaneously warrants a chuckle and an eye-roll, in that exact order. It just felt odd to watch this second installment bend over backwards to prominently showcase the Lyft logo when it previously employed McCall at a knock-off Home Depot. The first film avoided the idea of intentional product placement altogether, but the sequel succumbs to shamelessly promoting actual companies far too quickly and far too easily. 
An element that The Equalizer 2 does carry over from its predecessor is McCall being a proactive member of his community. Of course, it would be tremendously difficult to abandon this idea since it's the very essence of the character, but stranger things have happened. Anyways, this becomes somewhat problematic whenever these threads interfere with the overarching plot. There are certainly some occasional heartwarming beats, but these are few and far between in this bloated sequel. They often feel like unnecessary detours and don't quite work in execution. The first film did a much better job integrating McCall's mentorship into the ongoing story because it tied into everything else. 
Surely, Denzel made a difference though, right? Well, yes and no... Denzel Washington doesn't really ever turn in a poor portrayal, but I'd consider this to be one of his most average performances yet. Washington has a natural charm and gravitas that instantly elevates any material he's given, so so he's convincing as both a cold-blooded killer and an astute mentor. It's the script that really lets him down because his character doesn't really experience any growth and Washington rarely gets an opportunity to showcase his ability or range. Acting alongside him, Ashton Sanders does a fine job as troubled teenage Miles Whittaker. Washington and Sanders have a solid rapport with one another so the surrogate father/son relationship is especially convincing, but the subplot itself is uninteresting and uneventful.
In the supporting ranks, recognizable actors such as Pedro Pascal, Melissa Leo, and Bill Pullman are totally wasted. Pascal has very little screentime or personality, which cripples his character almost entirely. If you've seen the trailers, you might know what happens to Leo, and then Pullman's completely forgotten about at the end. 
In an effort to achieve true balance within the franchise, The Equalizer 2 is as equally mundane as the first film was entertaining. In other words, you can expect this action-thriller to be a tedious use of two hours.

Film Assessment: C-

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Throwback Thursday Review: 'The Equalizer'

Since there were two major sequel releases this past weekend, I decided to share two Throwback Thursday Reviews coinciding with both films. I'm a little late on this one due to the hub-bub of San Diego Comic Con, but I've already published my reviews of Mamma Mia! and Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again and you can expect my review of The Equalizer 2 soon. This week, I aim to review Teen Titans Go! To The Movies and complete my Mission: Impossible series of reviews with reviews for Mission: Impossible - Ghost ProtocolMission: Impossible - Rogue Nation, and the upcoming Mission: Impossible - Fallout. Additionally, I will be likely be sharing my thoughts on You Were Never Really Here and Love, Simon sometime before my post disclosing my best and worst films of the year so far. I've also decided to push that post back one last time to give my other reviews some breathing room.

'The Equalizer' Review


The Equalizer trails Robert McCall, a man who's put his mysterious past behind him and dedicated himself to starting a quiet life. But when McCall meets a young girl who has been exploited and manhandled by violent Russian mobsters, he comes out of self-imposed retirement and hones his particular skillset to fight for the helpless.
Based on an '80s television series, The Equalizer was written by Richard Wenk and directed by Antoine Fuqua. While Fuqua's direction is slick and stylish, this vigilante thriller is firmly grounded in reality and McCall's humanity as well. If it weren't for his exceptional skillset, McCall would be no different from the "Average Joe," and this is communicated quite well as the hum-drum of his ordinary life unfolds at the start. He makes do working at a Home Mart, motivating those closest to him, and reading through each book on the list of 100 books everyone should read. He really does seem like a normal guy till everything goes south. It's a slow burn to get to the real action, but the wait is worth it because of everything it does to develop McCall and instill an understanding of his surrounding community.
Although the jump-cut edits are excessive at times and it's therefore more difficult to follow the fight choreography, the action in and of itself is gritty, gruesome, and particularly enjoyable to watch. The jump-cuts were probably done to mask Denzel and his stunt double, but they also detract from the flow of the sequence and are quite jarring. In that regard, The Equalizer is hardly different from any other run-of-the-mill action flicks to be released in the last ten years. 
What sets The Equalizer apart from today's action-thriller landscape is having an actor of Denzel Washington's caliber front and center. While hardly his best work, Washington brings a calm, stoic demeanor to McCall that contrasts wonderfully with the brutality on display. Washington also pairs nicely with whoever he's sharing the screen with, whether it be Chöe Grace Moretz, Johnny Skourtis, Melissa Leo, Bill Pullman. Haley Bennett, or David Harbour. 
Opposite Denzel, Marston Csokas relishes in the villainy of playing a Russian mobster. While certainly not a ground-breaking portrayal or even a well-rounded role from a writing perspective, Csokas elevates his material tremendously and makes for a menacing antagonist despite his nonthreatening name of Teddy.
All things being equal, The Equalizer balances the scales as an entertaining action-thriller that's well-worth a watch. It may not be a genre game-changer, but it wasn't ever trying to be, and that's well within reason. 

Film Assessment: B-

Saturday, July 21, 2018

'Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again' Review

Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again fluctuates between the lives of Donna circa 1979 and her daughter Sophie in the present day to intertwine two tales and show how relationships formed in the past resonate in the present. Determined to live out her mother's dream, Sophie prepares for the grand re-opening of her hotel the Bella Donna with the guidance of her mother's friends. As she becomes overwhelmed by the daunting tasks, Sophie learns more about Donna's past as she discovers how she ran the hotel, met each of Sophie's dads, and raised a baby all on her own.
Written and directed by Ol Parker, Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again is a prequel/sequel to the decade-old jukebox musical motion-picture, Mamma Mia!. Story writing credits go to Parker, Richard Curtis, and Catherine Johnson (a writer/producer on the first film), but I noticed Here We Go Again's storytelling structure seems to have been inspired by The Godfather Part II. The film cuts between timelines on a dime which occasionally allows for some creative transitions, but there were also several switches that were just jarring, unnecessary, and awkward in execution. This decision to split the screentime between these two storylines is an interesting one, but ultimately the fractured focus holds each narrative from reaching its full potential. The audience is then left with a half-baked musical memoir. 
I'm sure some of you are already upset that I'd dare critique the plot of a musical because "that's not the point," but I can rattle off plenty of marvelous movie musicals with both a quality story and incredible music. La La LandSing StreetInto The WoodsLes Misérables, EnchantedWest Side Story, Phantom of the OperaOliver!Singing' in the RainThe Sound of Music, The Wizard of Oz, and most Disney productions. I could go on, but I won't for the sake of length. I'm actually getting war flashbacks to December when I was unimpressed with The Greatest Showman and am already aware this will likely be a contested review as well, but I don't really care because I feel like I need to share my genuine opinion on things rather than conform to what others deem to be appropriate. There's not really a way around it... Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again is a lackluster sequel and mediocre musical in nearly every way imaginable.
As I've already addressed, the story's stretched thin by the decision to tell a story on two fronts. There's somehow even less of a plot holding this thing together than the first film, no regard for continuity, and some baffling choices were made as to how to best progress the series (I presume there will be an unnecessary third installment as well). While I certainly enjoyed the first two-thirds for the most part due to some energetic, entertaining musical numbers, the third act lost all momentum and dragged so much. It was only an hour and fifty four minutes, but towards the end I kept thinking to myself "when is this going to end?..." It seriously felt like I was watching a three hour film because the energy and sense of pacing completely disappeared. At that point, it was torturous to say the least... but I'll get to that momentarily... Just be patient and remember that this is coming from someone who LIKES musicals... 
One story element that was handled quite distastefully was Donna's trio of romantic entanglements. Here We Go Again was already put in a tough spot when it decided to depict this because the first film dictated that these encounters happened within quick succession of one another. Otherwise, Donna would have immediately known who Sophie's father was. However, Donna basically slept with each guy after a quick musical number and you didn't really buy the chemistry between the actors because everything happened so fast... Next thing you know, she's moved on. There didn't seem to be much effort being made to flesh out the relationships whatsoever. To me, it really painted Donna in a bad light and I wish I could have bought into the bonds being formed between Donna and the three men. 
If Here We Go Again got one thing right though, it was casting Lily James as a young Donna. Between this, Cinderella (2015), and Baby Driver, James has proven herself to be a captivating, charismatic screen presence and I'd love to see her as a female lead in more musicals. She has the looks, an exceptional singing voice, and a genuinely uplifting aura. She wound up being a great stand-in for Meryl Streep in a weird way as well, but more on that in a moment...
Alongside Lily as younger versions of characters from the first film are Jessica Keenan Wynn, Alexa Davies, Jeremy Irvine, Josh Dylan, and Hugh Skinner. They play young Tanya, Rosie, Sam, Bill, and Harry respectively, but each actor did an excellent job channeling the persona and mannerisms of the older actor while making the role their own.
Meanwhile, returning cast members Amanda Seyfried, Christine Baranski, Julie Walters, Pierce Brosnan, Stellan Skarsgård, Colin Firth, and Dominic Cooper do a swell job reprising their respective roles. None of them are really given any substantial material outside of Seyfried, but their presence definitely won't go unnoticed either.
You can't really write a review of a film which stars Meryl Streep without addressing her whatsoever, and I've gotta say she was is in like two scenes at most. There really wasn't much of a legitimate reason for her conspicuous absence either... The actress is still alive, so you think a film banking on her name would want to make the most of her, but they really wasted her to be completely honest. I'm guessing it was to keep the budget down because I presume she commands a big paycheck and they didn't want to pay her an unreasonable amount. 
I try not to be overly negative, but there's no polite way to get around the fact that Cher sounded god-awful in this. Like I'm pretty positive my ears got some form of cancer after listening to her... I was baffled at how such a beloved pop singer could sound so terrible. I guess it makes sense that she's basically a has-been now... To make matters worse, her role had absolutely no bearing on the plot and was clearly written with the intention of shoe-horning a cameo appearance for Cher. My entire family agreed that she sounded terrible, so it wasn't just me either. 
To put it simply, Here We Go Again is a disappointing follow-up to a feel-good musical. There are some bright spots, but not even more ABBA could save this thing from its sealed fate as an inferior sequel. I realize it's called Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again, but Mamma Mia! Let's Please Never Do This Again would have been a more fitting title. 

Film Assessment: C+