'Godzilla vs. Kong' Review

Synopsis: Kong and his protectors undertake a perilous journey to find his true home, and with them is Jia, a young orphaned girl with whom he has formed a unique and powerful bond. But they unexpectedly find themselves in the path of an enraged Godzilla, cutting a swath of destruction across the globe. The epic clash between the two titans -instigated by unseen forces- is only the beginning of the mystery that lies deep within the Earth's core.

Runtime: 113 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of creature violence/destruction and brief language)

Who should see it? Fans of Godzilla and King Kong.

After seven years, Warner Bros. and Legendary's MonsterVerse culminated in the greatly anticipated, super-sized showdown between King Kong and Godzilla. However, this isn't the first time these creatures have come face-to-face, as they previously duked it out in the 1962 King Kong vs. Godzilla. Regardless, the appeal of this updated confrontation is clear. It's purely a matter of witnessing this silly spectacle on the largest screen possible. Audiences expect a giant monkey and gargantuan gecko to fight one another with zero regard for their surroundings- however, with modern special effects this time around. Directed by Adam Wingard with a story and screenplay from Terry Rossio, Michael Dougherty, Zach Shields, Eric Pearson, and Max Borenstein, Godzilla vs. Kong delivers on that very promise.

Like prior MonsterVerse installments, Godzilla vs. Kong is especially disinterested in its human characters. There are also stupid contrivances that happen purely to move the plot along and ensure the titans fight one another. These observations aren't huge revelations, as it's become the norm for this franchise and is to be expected at this point. However, sheer spectacle compensates for the absurdity. This blockbuster extravaganza is best enjoyed on the largest screen you currently feel comfortable seeing it, with your brain turned off and a tub of popcorn in your lap. For all its shortcomings concerning story and character, the action and effects in Godzilla vs. Kong will keep your eyes occupied. Wingard knows precisely the kind of movie he's making, and entertainment value is rightfully his highest priority.     

One noticeable improvement from King of the Monsters is the clarity in kaiju fight sequences. The environmental effects enhance the atmosphere rather than obscure the action. And on that note, the two titular combatants look incredible thanks to the many talented visual effects artists' phenomenal work. This movie wouldn't be possible without them. And I'd be remiss to ignore the sound department and composer Thomas Holkenborg for their essential contributions. This movie is downright ridiculous, but the soundscape lends a sense of gravitas to the smackdown.

As I attested to earlier, meaningful human characterization is severely lacking here. An ensemble of A-listers imbues a series of stock characters with as much life and personality as they can, but the script offers very little substance. Kaylee Hottle and Rebecca Hall share a sweet maternal bond while Brian Tyree Henry and Julian Dennison flex their comedic chops. Strangely, Godzilla vs. Kong downplays recurring characters from King of the Monsters in favor of introducing many fresh faces. Millie Bobby Brown's Madison Russell has a subplot but feels tangential to the central conflict, with that thread existing to introduce a surprise third combatant. Her father, Mark Russell, portrayed by Kyle Chandler, has been promoted to director of Monarch, the government agency monitoring these monsters. However, the promotion comes with the caveat of reduced screen time and personality. Though I like these actors, Alexander Skarsgärd and Eiza González seemed the most inconsequential among the cast. And it was a pleasant surprise to see Demián Bichir play a mustache-twirling corporate executive, considering I like his role in The Hateful Eight.

That said, humans aren't the main attraction. Godzilla and King Kong are headlining this crossover blockbuster brawl, and audiences want to see these behemoths fight each other. The movie delivers on that front, and the spectacle is well worth the price of admission (or HBO Max subscription). For those curious, the filmmakers sympathize much more with Kong over his reptilian counterpart, practically begging viewers to root for the underdog. Godzilla's diehard fans probably won't be swayed, but there are convincing arguments that advocate for Kong as humanity's champion.  

At the end of the day, Godzilla vs. Kong is exactly what you expect. The plot dictates that a giant monkey and lizard should fight one another to accumulate ticket sales and HBO Max subscriptions. It's incredibly entertaining but equally as stupid. However, fun blockbusters are in short supply right now, so who am I to complain? Let them fight!

Film Assessment: B

'Professor Marston and the Wonder Women' Review

[This review was originally written in October 2017 and is now being published that my internship is over. For an explanation of this, visit my Fall 2017 Important Update post.] 

Professor Marston and the Wonder Women tells the true story of the coupled psychologists William Moulton Marston and Elizabeth Marston as they become involved in an unconventional romance with their instructional assistant Olive Byrne. The film then tells how the polygamous relationship inspired the creation of the one of the most iconic female comic book characters ever created, Wonder Woman, and the forgotten controversies surrounding her existence.

Wonder Woman had a big year in 2017 as it marked her 76th anniversary and the release of her first feature film that blew the lid off the box office and garnered nearly unanimous praise from critics, Wonder Woman. It seems like the release of a film outlining the story behind her inception couldn't have possibly come at a better time. I'll admit the scoop on Wonder Woman's creation was the drastic draw for myself, as I'm sure it will be for most people who watch the film, but viewers approaching Professor Marston and the Wonder Women should be cautious of the fact that the film is more about the circumstance surrounding the creator than the creation of the comic itself.

Written and directed by Angela Robinson, Professor Marston and the Wonder Women centers on an unordinary romance, but refuses to treat it as such. I think that for the purposes of this film, it makes sense for Robinson to avoid ostracizing the trio because the character's predicament is normal from their own point-of-view. While this sort of relationship would still be deemed peculiar today, it was firmly frowned upon then. Despite not agreeing with the concept of polygamy myself, I can't deny that the film's exploration of it was fascinating.

Luke Evans, Rebecca Hall, and Bella Heathcote each are able authenticate the idea three different people could love each other equally. You buy into their love because they do too. While Evans' portrayal of William Moulton Marston is quite charming, Heathcote and Hall are the ones who run away with the movie. Heathcote imbues Olive with both shyness and strength so that it's understandable how multiple people could be easily infatuated with her. Hall, on the other hand, is afforded an opportunity to express some exceptional acting chops as Elizabeth, and she delivers.

One thing that can't be ignored anytime a film's "based on a true story" is just how accurate the adaptation is contrasted to the real events. Usually it's difficult to tell, but it's always a fair assumption that certain moments were dramatized for the purposes of invigorating the story. Well, it turns out that's the case here as Professor Marston and the Wonder Women's accuracy has fallen under question by William Marston's granddaughter and other family members. Apparently, the family wasn't consulted in the making of the film, a conscious choice on Robinson's behalf so she could explore the story through her own eyes. That decision just seems incredibly odd to me, because you think there'd be a lot of insight to gain from involving the family along the way. Plus, it'd spare you the trouble of hearing any of the family member's outcries against the film later on.

Professor Marston and the Wonder Women works well for what it is (even if that means it's a conventional bio-pic), but the film isn't quite as bulletproof as Wonder Woman's bracelets. The first two acts steam full speed ahead with the romance angle, but everything derails in the uneven third act. Once the film gets to the comic book's origin, the pacing gets all out of whack as some segments feel rushed and others are unnecessarily drawn out. The runtime itself is approximately an hour and forty-eight minutes, but it admittedly felt much longer than that because of superfluous material. One other thing that bothered me was how the actors didn't appear to age at all in the twelve years presented by the film. I understand aging makeup is tricky and all, but it's like as if no one even bothered. 

Professor Marston and the Wonder Women is certainly an interesting watch, in-spite of its unsure accuracy, but my greatest takeaway from Professor Marston and the Wonder Women was the realization that Wonder Woman has long since evolved past Marston's conceived notions to become a more fitting feminist icon for today. 

Film Assessment: B-