Showing posts with label Noomi Rapace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Noomi Rapace. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

'Bright' Review

Bright illuminates a fictional reality where fantasy creatures and humans coexist. In Bright, orcs are looked down upon while humans, centaurs, and elves are widely accepted by society. Bright follows Daryl Ward, a human LAPD officer who recently recovered from an orc attack, who now must work alongside his orc partner Nick Jakoby to prevent a magical wand from getting into the wrong hands. Otherwise, an ancient evil will be unleashed and end the world.
Bright is directed by David Ayer, written by Max Landis, and represents Netflix's first foray into big budget blockbusters. The streaming service-turned-studio pumped a whopping $90 M budget into the fantasy-crime epic and has already announced plans for a sequel, but Bright wasn't well-received by critics, with some calling it one of the worst films of 2017. However, Bright was met with a much warmer reception by the streaming service's dedicated binge-watchers. Average audience members turned out in droves to watch Bright once it was released since they could simply stream from home, as it was reported that 11 M people watched it in the first three days. In addition, the film currently holds a favorable 87% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes and many people I've spoken to have had good things to say.
While I didn't allow those factors to influence my opinion, I wasn't overly optimistic on Bright due to the talent involved. Many members of the cast and crew carried over from director David Ayer's last film, Suicide Squad, and my opinion has on that film REALLY soured since I first saw it. I was willing to give Ayer another chance though, because I really liked Fury and it seems like Warner Bros really skewered his vision of Suicide Squad in post-production. With that being said, I'm not overly fond of the film's screenwriter Max Landis either. Landis often takes to Twitter to nitpick nearly every blockbuster, and I find many of his comments to be absolutely absurd (namely his "Rey is a Mary Sue" argument, but you can visit my Is Rey A Mary Sue? article for more on that topic specifically). At the risk of sounding biased, I was prepared for the possibilities that Bright might be good, great, mediocre, or even awful. However, Bright fell into the category of "laughably terrible." Landis often acts like he knows best, so frankly, I find it ironic and a bit funny when he fails so spectacularly... To add insult to injury, Landis boasted that Bright would be his Star Wars. 
Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of Bright was how Ayer and Landis squandered a promising premise with such lackluster execution. The fictional world these characters are living in could have been incredibly interesting, but everything is scattershot because Landis aimed to accomplish an immense agenda. It's apparent that Landis had a lot of ideas on his plate while writing this movie, but one can only feasibly tell so much of a story in under two hours. Landis clearly wanted to flesh out a fascinating fictional reality where humans lived alongside orcs, elves, fairies, and centaurs. He takes time to contemplate the social structure of this world and how that could differ from our reality, but in execution, not that much is changed. The dichotomy between their world and ours should be drastic, but it really isn't that different aside from all the fictional creatures roaming around. Maybe this was for budgetary reasons, but this alternate reality looks and feels just like real life Los Angeles, albeit during some sort of comic convention. 
Landis also attempts to interweave a subtle and smart allegory for rough race relations, but his efforts are horribly ham-fisted when all is said-and-done. I don't take issue with the idea of incorporating allegorical undertones, but this should never overtake the characters or story. Oddly enough, Zootopia (of all things) has equivalent ambitions, but Zootopia managed to actually accomplish its goal while telling a worthwhile story. Bright can't lay claim to either feat because the dialogue is cringeworthy, characters are wildly inconsistent, and the events are incomprehensible. Bright doesn't take the time to carefully setup certain events or actions, so expositional dialogue is oftentimes provided after the fact. By that point, you honestly won't care why something happened, but Landis feels an obligation to try and explain anyways. Even with an over reliance on exposition, ample unanswered questions and trivial sequences remain.
One consistency of Bright was that it implored me to ask myself time-and-time again "What am I even watching?..." The characters say one thing, but their actions suggest otherwise, and then most of what transpired didn't make a lick of sense. You'd think that the buddy cop dynamic might be a redeeming aspect, but the constant bickering between the characters was not an interesting interplay whatsoever. I also hoped the technical execution might make matters slightly more enjoyable, but even that wasn't enough. Some action sequences were kind of cool I guess, the makeup effects were proficient but ugly, and the cinematography from Roman Vasyanov was competent. 
Leading Bright, Will Smith adds another piece of hot garbage to his resume. Recently, it's seemed as though Smith has been cashing in his success as an actor for some quick paychecks, and Bright is no exception. Smith's natural knack for charm shines through of course, but the man doesn't seem to be trying too much these days. 
Joel Edgerton surprisingly manages to act his way through the orc prosthetic, so I applaud him for that, but his character was immensely egregious at times. As I touched on earlier, the chemistry between Smith and Edgerton wasn't quite there so I genuinely didn't care about either of them. Other members of the ensemble include Noomi Rapace, Edgar Ramírez, Ike Barinholtz, Jay Hernandez, and Lucy Fry, but their respective roles are hardly worth mentioning because of their characters' insignificance and lacking screen-time.
If Bright is indicative of what we should expect from Netflix's upcoming onslaught of original content, then we're looking towards a dark and gloomy future of substandard streaming material. I suppose the end of net-neutrality won't be so bad after all if it means we'll only be missing out on pathetic projects such as Bright. 

Film Assessment: D

Friday, May 19, 2017

Throwback Thursday Review: 'Prometheus'

I apologize for yet another delayed review but this week's Throwback Thursday is over Prometheus to coincide with the release of its sequel Alien: Covenant. If you happened to miss any of my Alien Anthology series of Retrospective Reviews, you can find those at the subsequent blue hyperlinks: Alien, Aliens, Alien 3, and Alien: Resurrection. Next week I'll be finishing out my series of Pirates of the Caribbean reviews as I review Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides to tie in with Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales. Other reviews you can expect to see over the course of May and June include Throwback Thursday Reviews over Cars, The Mummy (1999), Cars 2, Transformers: Age of Extinction, and Despicable Me 2 and new reviews for Alien: Covenant, Baywatch, Wonder Woman, The Mummy (2017), Cars 3, Transformers: The Last Knight, Baby Driver, and Despicable Me 3.

'Prometheus' Review


Nominated For: Best Visual Effects.

Prometheus follows an expeditionary team to the far reaches of space as they believe they've discovered a hint towards the origins of humanity. The team arrive to planet LV-223 (not LV-426, the planet shown in Alien and Aliens) and soon discover the answers they seek will lead them to horrifying conclusions.
At the time of Prometheus's release, it was ambiguous exactly how Prometheus fit into the Alien-universe. Since then, it's been given the distinction of being a quasi-prequel to Alien. This essentially means Prometheus certainly exists within the Alien Anthology but isn't a direct setup to Alien. After 33 years, Ridley Scott returned to his roots to helm Prometheus and thankfully delivered one of the Anthology's most coherent creative works in quite some time, for more on this read my reviews of Alien 3 and Alien: Resurrection. 
Even when accounting for Prometheus' flaws, distinctive and persistent philosophical ponderings surround the story. From beginning to end, Scott and his terrific technical crew paint a pretty picture using space as their canvas. Scott and cinematographer Dariosz Wolski capture exceptionally breathtaking images of the hushed, lovely landscape while the vfx team create resonant renderings that pair perfectly with the immense, spectacular sets constructed by the prime production designers. Marc Streintenfeld's sumptuous space score bodes well as accompaniment, filling the vacuum of space with ethereal tones played by a swelling, harmonious orchestra.
However, Prometheus is easily one of the most frustrating movies I've seen in recent memory because it poses plenty of questions but doesn't ever get around to granting any clear-cut answers. I'm not particularly bothered by a few dangling threads but screenwriters Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof leave Prometheus' monumental mysteries to be ill-defined, only painting broad strokes but never retracing their steps to refine any blemishes. I'm sure this was intentional incorporation into the grand scheme of Prometheus' philosophical nature but it's not fortuitous that they didn't fill in any gaping plot-holes. I will say that turns things around with a thrilling third act but up to that point you'll be peeved by the dumb decisions the expedition team partake in. This team is made up of intellectuals so their brainless behavior on the planet's surface is inexcusable.
Unfortunately, many of the crew members feel vaguely characterized as only the prominent players are given substantial depth and corresponding complexity. This in turn detracts from the supporting ensemble's subsequent portrayals but magnifies the principal characters. Noomi Rapace offers an excellent portrayal of devout archeologist Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, playing into the frantic uncertainty Prometheus provides. Rapace's Shaw isn't quite up to par with Ripley as a fascinating female lead but she's superb nevertheless. On the other hand, Emum Elliott showcases a steel-faced wooden portrayal of Shaw's partner and love interest Charlie Holloway. Guy Pearce also has an odd arc as an aged Peter Weyland. Charlize Theron and Idris Elba are sufficient as mission director Vickers and charming captain Janek respectively, each adding a dosage of star power to the mix. Elsewhere the crew composed of Logan Marshall Green, Sean Harris, Rafe Spall, Benedict Wong, and Kate Dickie are fine in their distinctive roles but none of the bunch bring anything particularly memorable to their characters.
On all accounts, it is certainly Michael Fassbender who steals the show. Fassbender's intricate android David is the most interesting character among the bunch as he demonstrates unconventional, individualistic autonomy. Fassbender brings a clout of gravitas that melds well with David and projects an ominous and unsettling disposition that plays out perfectly.
In conclusion, Prometheus boasts proficient performances, tremendous technical work, a splendid space score, and accomplished aesthetic but gets dragged down by presenting weighty philosophical questions and failing to conjure an adequate answer to any of them.

Film Assessment: C