'Bohemian Rhapsody' Review

Nominated For: Best Picture, Best Actor; Rami Malek, Best Film Editing, Best Sound Editing, and Best Sound Mixing. 

Won: Best Actor; Rami Malek, Best Film Editing, Best Sound Editing, and Best Sound Mixing. 

Bohemian Rhapsody rocks out as a foot-stomping celebration of Queen, their music and their extraordinary lead singer Freddie Mercury. The film traces the meteoric rise of the band through their iconic songs and revolutionary sound. 

I already know a vast majority of my readership will disagree with everything I'm about to say whether they've seen Bohemian Rhapsody or not because people love Queen that much, which is fine, but do know I'm separating my love and appreciation for Queen and their music from the film itself. I'm not critiquing this film based on the quality of music written, sung, and recorded 30-40 years ago (though there are a couple songs on the soundtrack which were recently remastered in 2011). I'm assessing the film independently of the music because everyone already knows Queen's music is excellent and the film doesn't exactly contain an inspired soundtrack since it's just a collection of Queen's greatest hits in a Queen/Freddie Mercury biopic. What other music would the filmmakers use?...

Though Bohemian Rhapsody is credited to director Bryan Singer, Dexter Fletcher swooped in to finish Singer's work when Singer was removed from the project late last year due to being absent throughout much of the film's production. However, the finished project did not seem to be the singular vision of either filmmaker or even an amalgamation of the two for that matter. What I watched was clearly a studio-assembled product meant to satisfy the surviving members of Queen to secure permission to use their legendary music. It's a surface-level examination of Freddie Mercury's life and Queen's music that loosely strings together prominent moments in the band's history and glosses over Mercury's troubled past (though it does fleetingly address his sexuality and issues with addiction). To put it bluntly, Mercury's Wikipedia page is honestly a more insightful window into the singer's life.

My biggest issue with the biopic is that it's severely lacking in depth, so I didn't feel like I learned anything new or interesting about Freddie Mercury or Queen after subjecting myself to a two hour and fourteen-minute long film which was supposed to be all about him and Queen. Bohemian Rhapsody is essentially a series of concert montages with doses of personal drama and minimal conflict or plot at its core. There are some inspired shots here and there, which can be glimpsed in the trailer, but those are ravaged by an overabundance of quick-cuts that I found to be somewhat distracting. It was almost as if 20th Century Fox mandated editor John Ottman insert a cut every ten-fifteen seconds in specific sequences. Much of this occurs strangely in simple scenes of dialogue between characters, so I have no idea exactly what transpired behind the scenes, but the troubles of this production were reflected onscreen.

What really irks me though is that people had the audacity to claim and complain that First Man "rewrote history" without watching the film and then boycotted the film for it to debut to a lackluster box office, but guess what?... Bohemian Rhapsody quite LITERALLY rewrites history in several instances (most prominently, by timing Freddie Mercury's AIDs diagnosis before the Live Aid concert to serve as an impromptu catalyst when he actually wasn't diagnosed till two years later), yet general audiences are eating it up because it's about Queen. 

Now for some positives before my readers riot against me... I thought the casting director, costuming, hair, and makeup teams each did excellent work. All the actors were the spitting image of the respective people they were tasked with portraying thanks to their handiwork and choice selection. Rami Malek was absolutely superb as Freddie Mercury, exhibiting Mercury's mannerisms, sure-fire attitude, and spirited persona with the utmost confidence and flamboyance. My only nitpick is that I wish he'd actually sung the music because I find lip-syncing to be a cheap cop-out for the studio. I get that replicating Mercury's voice is a daunting task, but as a singer, I find lip-syncing to be incredibly lazy. Moving your mouth and pretending to sing is not nearly as exhaustive as actually performing.  

As for the other actors, I wish they'd had more material to work with since their roles weren't very substantial in the grand scheme of things. The other band members seemed to be side-lined and just around to perform or have quick disagreements and subsequent resolutions with Mercury. I understand it's Freddie's story first and foremost, but a little more screen-time and focus on the rest of Queen would have been beneficial. 

Before I conclude though, I'd like to share a funny anecdote and an interesting observation from my viewing experience. One, I'm usually a stickler about parents bringing babies in a theater, but there was a baby there who cried out "Mama" in response to the "Mama Ooooooh" portion of "Bohemian Rhapsody." I found that incredibly amusing and it was honestly the highlight of my viewing experience (The baby was taken out soon afterward). Two, the font used throughout the film for crediting artists and signifying the date is the same font I use for my logo. Now I'm going to cram as many Queen lyrics as possible in my conclusion, but to ensure my opinion isn't lost in translation, I found Bohemian Rhapsody to be reasonably watchable but quite uninspired on the whole. If you disagree, that's fine. Keep on enjoying it and don't let me dictate what you should/shouldn't like or get wrapped up in the semantics of differing opinions.

Sorry, but Bohemian Rhapsody is not the champion, my friend. I'm not sure if this is the real life or if it's just fantasy, but Bohemian Rhapsody ain't a killer queen either. It's yet another mediocre musical biopic which bites the dust. It's got mud on its face, it's a big disgrace, and it's kicking its can all over the place. But don't let me stop you now, if you're having a good time and you don't wanna stop at all. If you're having a good time, keep having a good time. Just open your eyes, look up to the skies and see I'm just a person, I need no sympathy. My grades are easy come, easy go, little high, little low. Any way my score goes, shouldn't really matter to you... To you!

Film Assessment: C

'X-Men: Apocalypse' Review

Wednesday evening I attended an early screening of X-Men: Apocalypse and I'm just now publishing my review for a few reasons: first off, it will likely get the most attention today, secondly yesterday I was focused on a barrage of reviews for Alice in Wonderland, X-Men: First Class, and X-Men Days of Future Past - The Rogue Cut, and last but not least I had more time to reflect on the film to give a fairer review. Anyways, I've been looking forward to this film ever since watching the post credits scene of X-Men: Days of Future Past and so I've had about two years for my anticipation to build. Naturally this would mean my expectations were pretty high. Keep that in mind as you're reading my review because if you have tempered expectations this movie will probably be awesome in your eyes. 

'X-Men: Apocalypse' Review

When the early screening of X-Men: Apocalypse I attended Wednesday night ended, I found myself a bit underwhelmed. Therefore, I think it was for the best that I waited to review this film and let my opinion of it settle in. By no means is X-Men: Apocalypse a "bad movie", rather along the lines of underwhelming. X-Men: Apocalypse just wasn't able to measure up to it's predecessors in the young X-Men Trilogy (I'm not sure if there's an actual name for these or not but I'm referring to X-Men: First Class and X-Men Days of Future Past). 

Bryan Singer returns to helm his sequel to Days of Future Past, the first time he's directed two consecutive X-Men flicks since X-Men and X2, and X-Men: Apocalypse picks up a decade after Days of Future Past allowing Singer to tackle the 80's, something reflected in the believable hair, costume, and production design. 

There's actually a brief Star Wars reference where the characters discuss trilogies and Singer effectively takes a jab at X-Men: The Last Stand. Too bad the joke held true for this installment in comparison to First Class and Days of Future Past. It's a hilarious moment that Star Wars fans will definitely appreciate that takes full advantage of the 80's setting. 

Singer sizes down the scale of the film as there's no time travel elements to be found, but the stakes have never been higher for the X-Men as global destruction is certainly possible thanks to Apocalypse. The screenplay penned by Simon Kinberg finds itself muddled as there are just too many characters and storylines to properly service. The film tasked itself with not only continuing the saga of a younger Professor X, Magneto, Mystique, Quicksilver, and Beast, but also introducing a new baddie in Apocalypse, his subservient horseman, and younger versions of Cyclops, Jean Grey, and Nightcrawler. I can confidently say that Kinberg pulls most of it off. 

I say "most" as I found the creative team did a wonderful job depicting Cyclops, Jean Grey, and Nightcrawler and even continuing the ongoing arc from all the way back to First Class, but failed to give many of the characters the time and attention they deserved. For example, two of Apocalypse's horseman had no more than five lines of dialogue, with Storm having scarcely more than that to say. 

The Horsemen were basically around to give the X-Men someone to fight other than just Apocalypse and as fan service, not to say I didn't find the horseman cool just that some were underused. The makeup, costuming, and visual effects have never been better in the X-Men films as is to be expected with today's marvelous technology and modern filmmaking. However, there were a few spots here and there were some of the CGI looked a little fake. 

The film doesn't disappoint with it's action though, as there's one sequence featuring Magneto that's just heart wrenching, two showstopper sequences from Quicksilver that actually managed to top his incredible sequence in Days of Future Past, the action packed third act finale, and of course a cameo appearance from a fan favorite mutant in a gruesome sequence that will probably make any comic book fan a little giddy. If you've seen the final trailer you probably know who I'm referring to. 

So you're probably wondering if there's more to the movie than just spectacle to which I'll say there's a terrific cast amassed, whoever cast the new young mutants deserves a pat on the back. James McAvoy's back as a more seasoned Charles Xavier that I feel can finally adopt the monicker Professor X. 

Michael Fassbender gets a fresh arc for Magneto where he gets to really show off his dramatic acting chops and emotional gravitas that ties up his character arc in a satisfying manner (I wouldn't be surprised if he comes back in a future X-Men film though). 

Jennifer Lawrence's performance is quite bland as Mystique. It's difficult to tell if she really wants to be a part of this franchise anymore given her voiced complaints about Mystique's makeup and the franchise in general but it seems like she mailed this performance in due to contractual obligations. She's only in the Mystique guise when she's forced to be and just serves as an inspiration to the other mutants. Lawrence isn't terrible but her performance is certainly lacking compared to her previous turns as Mystique. 

Nicholas Hoult sadly is given very little to do as Hank McCoy, but if you want to get the most out of his performance I'd recommend watching both X-Men: First Class and X-Men: Days of Future Past - The Rogue Cut. He gets some awesome fight scenes as Beast in the third act and I can't praise the makeup work for his look as Beast enough. 

Evan Peters' Quicksilver is given significantly more to do as a result of the positive response to his turn in Days of Future Past. Quicksilver has a more emotional arc once he learns of his parentage, but that doesn't stop the speedster from having fun along the way. 

Newcomers, Sophie Turner, Tye Sheridan, and Kodi Smit-McPhee are all delightful as Jean Grey, Cyclops, and Nightcrawler. I particularly took a shine to Smit-McPhee's Nightcrawler and he's definitely my favorite character in this franchise after seeing him steal just about every scene he's apart of. 

The film also brings back Rose Byrne's Moira Mactaggert and Alex Till's Havok from First Class who I don't feel were vital to the film's story but had some great moments nonetheless. 

Oscar Isaac gets to go full baddie as Apocalypse, and I've got to say he was terrifying so I was satisfied with his portrayal. One little nitpick regarding Apocalypse was that his motive wasn't convincing and Apocalypse was evil for the sake of being evil and wanting power, etc. 

Under Apocalypse's control we find the four horseman, Magneto, Storm, Archangel, and Psylocke. Alexandra Shipp is serviceable as Storm but I don't think she's the definitive version like Turner's Jean Grey, Sheridan's Cyclops, and McPhee's Nightcrawler. Storm was cool in the action sequences she partook in but she didn't get enough development in my opinion. It's not like Berry's Storm was that developed either though. Ben Hardy's Angel/Archangel and Olivia Munn's Psylocke have virtually nothing to do as they're purely around for spectacle in the third act finale. 

When it comes down to it, there's enjoyment to be had and the film is fairly good. but just didn't meet my expectations. I can say that it excites me to think of the possibility of a 90's followup featuring the same cast but it's a shame that X-Men: Apocalypse just ultimately serves to setup that potential sequel rather than stand on it's own. Longtime fans of the X-Men movies should have a good time as it's shameless entertainment, but just be aware that the film ultimately feels like hollow spectacle and is missing the heart and care given to First Class and Days of Future Past.

Film Assessment: C+

Alternate Cut Review: 'X-Men Days of Future Past - The Rogue Cut'

Today, I'm introducing a new type of review called an Alternate Cut Review. The name is simple and pretty self-explanatory but the premise behind it is that I will review the director's cut of a film (Not always called the director's cut but that's basically what these are). The format for the reviews will be similar to my triple-R reviews where I include a link to my initial review, which will likely be the theatrical cut, and then write a review of the alternate cut of the film and even compare them to a degree. I figured this would be appropriate time to start with X-Men: Apocalypse releasing this weekend. I was originally going to do a Triple-R review over X-Men: Days of Future Past but decided that this would be more interesting. For one, it gave me a chance to finally sit down and watch The Rogue Cut, something I'd been meaning to do and it also is a new review format I hope to continue. Also my Triple-R reviews are intended for me to re-review films that I don't feel I did justice to in my older reviews as it's clear that my reviews have gotten much more analytical and more involved in comparison to when I began the blog. I've decided not to completely re-review these movies entirely by just scrapping the old review. I feel that leaving them on my blog shows the progress I've made and I don't want to delete my work since I'm still proud of them regardless. My next planned Alternate Cut Review will likely be Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice's Ultimate Edition when it's released on Blu-Ray. This will be a great opportunity to revisit it sooner as my opinion of it has slightly diminished and I feel that the score I gave it was a tad too high based on the preemptive excitement after seeing it for the first time. 

'X-Men Days of Future Past - The Rogue Cut' Review

Nominated for: Best Visual Effects.

Theatrical Cut Review- X-Men: Days of Future Past Review

"The Rogue Cut" Review- X-Men: Days of Future Past marks Bryan Singer's return to the franchise, his last installment being X2 and effectively wiping out what can widely be regarded as everyone's least favorite X-Men films, X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine, from the X-Men timeline. 

Singer brought it upon himself to not only adapt a beloved comic arc but also unite the cast from his X-Men Trilogy (He didn't make the third but you know what I mean) and X-Men: First Class through the means of time travel. Time travel, when ill-used, can be confusing but Simon Kinberg's screenplay clears up all confusion thanks to limiting the time travel capabilities and some proper explanation through clever expository dialogue. The time travel also provides some meaningful opportunities for some really awesome paralleled editing between the future and past timelines that is amplified a bit in The Rogue Cut, a very welcome change. 

The Rogue Cut doesn't change the story so much as add to it in some meaningful ways. The most significant change is the addition of Rogue in the future portion of the film, an addition I prefer as it provides more plot in the future timeline rather than just waiting around for Logan to change the timeline and the Sentinels to arrive. This allows for a rescue that provides a more meaningful death to a certain character than his end in the theatrical cut and a chance for McKellen's Magneto to shine some more with an awesome sequence cutting between him and Fassbender's Magneto in the past that's appropriately intense and carries plenty of dramatic gravitas. 

There's also a subplot picked up from X-Men: First Class focusing on the relationship between Mystique and Beast that remained untouched and practically ignored in the theatrical cut that really amplifies Mystique's character arc, providing further explanation to her actions. Other than that, the changes from the theatrical release seem fairly minuscule with a few scenes roped in and slight differentiations in dialogue and some cases where and when the said dialogue is delivered. To be fair, I haven't watched the theatrical version in about two years, but still feel confident I was able to derive where The Rogue Cut diverged. 

As for the film itself, Singer's direction is subtle yet brilliant. Singer manages to effectively craft multiple environments for multiple points in time and stay true to all of them based on what's presented. Singer takes the screenplay and runs through events smoothly with engaging action visual effects spectacle, some nicely choreographed fight scenes, and integral character drama. The franchise's visual aesthetic is seemingly at it's peak with this installment where the costuming, visual effects, production design, and cinematography are top notch. In particular, I felt the collaboration of makeup, costuming, and visual effects make all the mutants look remarkable, especially Mystique and Beast. 

In regards to action, the film delivers with a number of entertaining action sequences including the fights against the Sentinels in the bleak dystopian future, any fight scene with Mystique where she utilizes tactile efficiency disposing of her enemies, and the third act finale where Magneto lifts an entire ball park stadium and drops it on the White House Lawn controlling the 70's sentinels amidst the chaos, talk about spectacle! The standout sequence that will be revered for many years to come though is without a doubt the Quicksilver sequence. 

Watching him speed about mischievously to "Time in a Bottle" with all the surrounding action in slow motion was just glorious! 

What elevates X-Men: Days of Future Past above most superhero fare (Not all, just a majority) is it's deluxe treatment for it's main characters and the excellent performances amassed by combining two casts into one full length epic crossover of sorts. 

Hugh Jackman rightfully earns top billing for his turn as Wolverine, at this point it's nearly impossible to imagine anyone else in the role. Jackman gets to be a bit more levelheaded than seen previously as he has to be the voice of reason to convince the 70's mutants that their future is in peril. 

James McAvoy gets a more interesting arc as a disillusioned Charles Xavier this time around. Micheal Fassbender is much more villainous and unpredictable with even more motive behind his actions as malevolent Magneto. These two keep up the great work they started in X-Men: First Class further building on that strained relationship and in one sequence it totally pays off as the two verbally hash it out in an intense scene onboard a private jet, each with some valid arguments at their disposal. 

Jennifer Lawrence gives her best turn yet as the lovely but dangerous Mystique. The war for Mystique's soul continues to rage on between Magneto's militaristic view and Xavier's serene sentiment but Mystique manages to carve out her own stake in the matter, somewhere in the middle ground, allowing for some terrific moments between all three actors as they attempt to convince each other that their way is best. 

Nicholas Hoult gets more screen time than his limited portrayal in X-Men: First Class and brings a conflicted Hank McCoy to the fray. McCoy struggles to determine whether his mutation is a blessing or a curse, repressing both his and Charles with a formula that keeps him human and helps Xavier's legs function, and I felt that his scenes focusing on his mutation elicited some memorable moments from Hoult.

Rounding out the 70's characters is Evan Peters' mischievous speed demon, Quicksilver. Like I said earlier, Peters steals just about every scene he's in and his action sequence is incredible. A huge surprise as I lacked confidence in his portrayal in my initial viewing due to his wacko costume, needless to say never judge a book by it's cover.

For our antagonist in the past and in a manner of speaking the future, we have Peter Dinklage's Bolivar Trask, a scientist whose ill feelings towards mutants aren't quite fleshed out enough to agree with. Dinklage is fine in the manner used but had potential to be a great villain.

Meanwhile in the future many of the core cast members from the X-Men Trilogy are brought back including Patrick Stewart's Professor X, Ian McKellen's Magneto, Halle Berry's Storm, Ellen Page's Kitty Pryde, Shawn Ashmore's Iceman, Daniel Cudmore's Colossus, and Anna Paquin's Rogue (In The Rogue Cut that is).

In the future, many new mutants are to be found in the form of Omar Sy's Bishop, Chinese actress Bingbing Fan's Blink, Adan Canto's Sunspot, and Booboo Stewart's Warpath. All the mutants mentioned in the future have their moments to shine fighting the sentinels. And there's a few surprise cameos which I won't spoil for those who have yet to watch X-Men: Days of Future Past.

In conclusion, X-Men: Days of Future Past is the complete X-Men movie package with incredible cast members present from both the X-Men trilogy and X-Men: First Class  memorable epic action sequences, a refined visual aesthetic, and a satisfying story that ties it all together and essentially erases the worst X-Men films from existence.

If you have yet to add X-Men: Days of Future Past to your Blu-Ray collection, I advise that The Rogue Cut is the way to go, since it includes both "The Rogue Cut" and the Theatrical Cut, so even if you don't take a liking to the lengthy The Rogue Cut you still have the more condensed version to watch. X-Men: Days of Future Past remains to be my favorite X-Men film (This includes Deadpool), and I think that The Rogue Cut actually improves on the theatrical cut in some areas, making for a more complete viewing experience that draws little more on it's predecessor, X-Men: First Class.

Film Assessment: A+

'X-Men: Days of Future Past' Review

Nominated for: Best Visual Effects.

By far the best X-Men movie made so far and it definitely hyped me up for whats to come for the series. It came up with a great solution to solve a majority of the continuity errors from the previous X-Men movies by altering the timeline giving Fox creative freedom to fill in the gap.  Bryan Singer did a wonderful job directing and was able to create action scenes that left my eyes glued to the screen. I saw the film in 3D and think it definitely added to the experience. The acting in this movie was incredible the standout performances were Hugh Jackman, Evan Peters, Jennifer Lawrence, James McAvoy, Nicholas Hoult and Michael Fassbender. First of all, Hugh Jackman had some great scenes as Wolverine, he fits the role perfectly and I hope he will continue playing it in the years to come. Evan  Peters portrayed Quicksilver and a few months ago when photos were released of his costume I was worried that this version of Quicksilver wasn't going to be that great. But I ate my words when Evan Peters stole every scene he was in as a mischievous teenager, his scenes were hilarious and amongst my favorite moments of the movie, once I got past the ridiculous costume, I hope he will return in future X-Men films because he was a highlight of the movie. Don't worry there's a great joke that honors his parentage. Next, Jennifer Lawrence was young Mystique and I was very surprised how much the film revolved around her character she was central to the plot and throughout the film Charles and Magneto are fighting for her soul. Charles desires for her to turn back and be good while Magneto desires her to do what is necessary in order to protect mutants and I thought that was interesting dynamic of the movie. She delivered a solid performance and was given much more importance compared to X-Men: First Class. Nicolas Hoult played a young Hank McCoy, aka Beast, and did great for what he had to work with, it was great to see the character return since Beast is one of my favorite mutants. James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender each delivered a outstanding performance returning as young Charles Xavier aka Professor X  and young Erik Lehnsherr aka Magneto  respectively. Overall the film did a great job utilizing two storylines, the future and the past, without seeming to be overcrowded with characters. I recommend you see this movie but you don't need to see it in 3D, its just an added bonus that makes the action scenes more enjoyable. Make sure you stay through the credits!