Paddington 2 bears witness to the return of Paul King as writer and directer, although King does receive some screenwriting assistance from Simon Farnaby this time around. King steps right back into his roles with relative ease as he's able to station audiences right back in the whimsical world they last left at the end of the fantastic first film. Oftentimes, sequels promise to deliver more of what viewers enjoyed about the original in their attempt to franchise a single commercial hit into a string of sequels and spin-offs. While Paddington 2 certainly follows that formula by keeping the charming characters and sentimental story up at the forefront, King successfully freshens things up a bit.
For one, the mild-mannered, marmalade enthusiast winds up in the slammer after a massive mishap. Perhaps, that may seem like an excuse for a series of silly shenanigans, but King utilizes the barren big house to emphasize how an infectiously upbeat attitude can turn an awful situation around. Obviously, this shouldn't be taken TOO literally. If you are imprisoned and attempt to befriend the hardened criminals surrounding you, you likely won't be as lucky as Paddington was. The films can be quite silly and unrealistic after all. However, King's messages are a cheerful source of encouragement to children that a positive outlook on life will always come in handy, even in the worst of times.
It's well-intentioned moral lessons like this that are scarcely found among family-friendly fare these days. Sure, there are occasional animated ventures that stand above the rest. Last year, it was Coco and The LEGO Batman Movie, but for each of those exceptional examples, there were countless cash grabs to be found including the likes of Despicable Me 3, The Emoji Movie, and Ferdinand. I don't bring this topic up in order to drag those movies through the mud again, but rather to point out a greater problem in Hollywood. In an effort to make a quick buck, studios hardly pay attention to the importance of story, character, and worthwhile messages in their family-friendly content, which is precisely why it's reassuring to see such a sweet sequel as Paddington 2. I don't say this with the mindset that you won't find another quality family film released this year, because I'm sure there will be at least a couple, but merely to implore how genuinely goodnatured Paddington 2 is in comparison to other entertainment today.
Now I'm sure many of you reading this review have "100%" running through your mind because that's the current Rotten Tomatoes critic rating for Paddington 2... You may have come for further validation that this film is deserving of such a distinguished honor or because you think it's impossible that Paddington 2 of all things has a 100%. I personally believe the general public have begun to place way too much emphasis on this number, but that's a discussion I'd like to have another day with a post detailing why Rotten Tomatoes really doesn't matter. So to go ahead and quickly address this, I'll quickly explain the mechanics of Rotten Tomatoes (if you know how it works, go ahead and skip over this). A 100% rating does not mean every critic rated Paddington 2 with a perfect score. It actually means every Rotten Tomatoes certified critic gave the film a "fresh" review (meaning they liked the film). The Rotten Tomatoes score is set up as an aggregate compilation of the results of a binary choice, "fresh" or "rotten." A certified critic determines one or the other when linking their trade review to the site. The mass conspiracy that the site is rigged in favor of particular films is absurd and incorrect. It's as simple as the critic liked it or they didn't. That's all there is to it.
Sally Hawkins, Hugh Bonneville, Madeleine Harris, Samuel Joslin, and Julie Walters all return as the respective members of the Brown family including the compassionate mother Mary, fervent father Henry, headstrong Judy, insecure Jonathan, and fiery Ms. Bird. Each has their moment in the limelight, but Hawkins and Bonneville are allotted the most screen-time as the peculiar parents. Other familiar faces (and voices) found among the distinguished ensemble are Peter Capaldi, Imelda Staunton, and Jim Broadbent who excel with the material provided to them.
Taking the place of Nicole Kidman's campy antagonist, Hugh Grant plays an array of kooky caricatures as formerly well-renowned character actor Phoenix Buchanan. He doesn't quite relish in his malevolence like most villains... Instead, Grant delightfully soaks in the glory of Buchanan's ego, acting abilities, and a bit of Sondheim (stick around through the first half end credits to see an utterly delightful song and dance number).
