Showing posts with label John Malkovich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Malkovich. Show all posts

Saturday, August 18, 2018

'Mile 22' Review

Mile 22 travels alongside James Silva, a CIA operative leading a classified tactical command unit. Aided by his team, Silva must retrieve and transport an asset in possession of sensitive information from an American embassy in Southeast Asia to an airfield twenty-two miles away for extraction. Silva and his squad soon find themselves in a race against time as the city's military, police, and street gangs close in to reclaim the asset.  
Mile 22 stars Mark Wahlberg and is directed by Peter Berg, marking the fourth time the actor and director have worked together (previous collaborations include Lone SurvivorDeepwater Horizon, and Patriots Day). I've jokingly referred to this team-up as "Berg & 'Berg" in the past, but a consistent quality can be gleaned from all three of their projects. I've liked some more than others, but Berg & 'Berg had yet to let me down... Till Thursday evening, Augst 16, 2018 that is... I didn't even know Mile 22 existed till about two weeks ago because I hadn't seen a single trailer for it. As someone who regularly keeps up with entertainment news, I found it fairly troubling that Mile 22 had flown almost completely under my radar. That should have probably been my first sign that Mile 22 would be the first Berg & 'Berg misfire...
The only cinematic situation more disappointing than a bad movie is a bad movie involving talent you trust. Peter Berg may not quite be one of my favorite directors working today, but he's certainly a skilled filmmaker whose work I eagerly anticipate to see. Sure, Berg may have directed Battleship in 2012, but he had a hot streak of releases soon after. Alas, the short-lived excellence of Berg & 'Berg had to sink eventually. Of the productions Berg & 'Berg have worked on together, this is the only one not to be based on true events. Maybe that was the lynchpin to their success or perhaps Mile 22 was merely an exemplary concept botched in execution. Whatever the case may be, Lea Carpenter and Graham Roland are credited with developing the story and Carpenter has the sole screenplay credit. 
A sloppy story foundation lies as the root of most of Mile 22's problems. After the opening scene, the subsequent thirty minutes or so are incredibly difficult to follow because hardly any noteworthy information is conveyed to the audience visually or through exposition. Viewers are thrust into a situation without an explanation of what's going on exactly. The audience is certainly shown a lot through jarring, excessive jump-cuts, but none of these images can be used to piece together a cohesive plot. The most you'll be able to gather is that you're watching a spec-ops team in some facility following a failed mission some years after the opening mission. The specifics are irritatingly vague, but things eventually fall into place and the story gets going. It just takes awhile and the path taken certainly isn't advisable. 
Compounding this confusion are several sequences of incomprehensible action. The actual combat itself could be quite thrilling, but the world and I will never know on account of the obnoxious shaky-cam and incoherent editing. You can hardly ever tell what's going on due to the sheer magnitude of rapid-fire cuts. Even the simple dialogue exchanges are snipped to shreds. Coupled with muted color grading, this made Mile 22 a tiresome experience when it could have easily been explosive and exciting. What makes this infinitely more annoying is the inclusion of renowned martial artist Iko Uwais as an actor and fight choreographer. If you've seen The Raid, you know Uwais is adept in this arena. There's absolutely no need to cut around this actor as though he were Liam Neeson, yet the editor persisted when the fights could have been shown in more drawn-out wide shots to be infinitely more effective. Additionally, there were some outlandish stunts which really felt out of place considering the film first established itself as a grounded action thriller.
Character-wise, everyone's flimsily written without an arc and the performances aren't much better. I don't think Mark Wahlberg's ever been worse, and I've seen him in two Michael Bay Transformers movies for crying out loud... Here, he spews a hundred words a minute in trademark Marky-Mark fashion and it didn't help that his character was especially unlikable either. As I've previously mentioned, Mile 22 squanders the abilities of Iko Uwais by over-editing his fight sequences and the actor isn't compensated with any worthwhile material. Otherwise, Ronda Rousey, Laura Cohan, and John Malkovich are alright, but hardly have anything to do and the remaining actors are even worse off in that regard. 
When writing negative reviews, I always make an intentional effort to desperately search the film I'm reviewing for any elements that could be considered redeeming qualities before bestowing a letter grade. I've now scanned a feature which runs ninety-five minutes long and plots itself out twenty-two miles wide, and there's nothing salvageable about any of it. Frankly, Mile 22 isn't even worth the walking distance to watch on your own couch whenever the film makes its way to home media, your favorite streaming service, or the desolate landscape of early morning cable. 

Film Assessment: F


Tuesday, October 4, 2016

'Deepwater Horizon' Review

Nominated For: Best Visual Effects and Best Sound Editing.

Deepwater Horizon offers personal insight into the true events of the April 2010 oil rig explosion that caused the largest oil spill in history by showing the horrific disaster through the eyes of the workers onboard. 
Peter Berg directs the disaster flick as his followup to Lone Survivor and Berg expertly captures the chaotic nature of the explosions onboard the Deepwater Horizon in the more action packed moments. However, the framework established in the screenplay penned by Matthew Michael Canahan and Matthew Sand doesn't quite set the stage properly. I found the first half to be rather mundane and generic and wished the characters had been further explored. I found it difficult to care for the supporting characters given how little character development and meaningful screen time they had received but I guess that's the nature of things when you have to dedicate a large portion of the film's running time to the catastrophe at hand. 
Deepwater Horizon does however succeed in effectively simplifying the concepts behind the disaster in addition to making the oil rig a tense environment from the get-go. I also feel it's worth commending all the effects, albeit practical or computer generated, that went into simulating the tragedy on film as the explosions weren't overdone and felt authentic. The performances on display for the most part were serviceable considering that the actors were essentially portraying ordinary oil workers and aren't exactly provided with plenty of depth or range to explore. 
Of the bunch, Mark Wahlberg demonstrates incredible display of acting ability with one of the film's closing scenes that seemingly shows the PTSD Mike Williams is suffering from as a result of these events. Wahlberg injects his typical charm into the role and makes Williams both a likable and relatable protagonist fulfilling the needs of the role. Kate Hudson impressed me, making for an interesting ancillary character in the role of Felicia Williams and sharing great chemistry opposite Wahlberg. 
In regards to the other supporting players, Kurt Russell musters up some Southern drawl in Jimmy Harrell, Dylan O'Brien sadly has little to do as Caleb Holloway but is great in his supporting capacity, Gina Rodriguez's Andrea Fleets barely registered to me when onscreen, and John Malkovich is about as slimy as it gets as the greedy corporate businessman Vidrine. 
In conclusion, Peter Berg manages to craft an intense disaster thriller that seeps into the viewers' mind and leaves a lasting impression thanks to some sufficient performances and appropriately terrifying sequences of destruction.

Film Assessment: C+